My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1985 01 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1985 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1985 01 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:54 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:44:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
1/15/1985
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1985 01 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> can not get to the point that in needed. there <br /> would not be a Notice to Proceed issued. and the <br /> contract would be dissolved. <br /> Mayor Meier gloved that the bid be awarded to <br /> Williams Concrete Construction Corp. with the <br /> condition that changes be made in the scheduling <br /> and componenws of the plant such as to effectuate <br /> some substantial reduction in total cost and to <br /> have the reduction submitted to the City <br /> Council prior to the issuing the Notice to <br /> Proceed. <br /> Luce seconded and asked that the motion include <br /> the wording "for their (council 's) approvals <br /> be inserted after "the reduction submitted to - <br /> City Council" so that it would be clear that <br /> council would have the ability to deny approval <br /> should it not meet the City's budgetary abilities. <br /> The motion was carried unanimously. <br /> HARPER LAKE PROJECT Hundley turned the discussion over to Dan Ault. <br /> Rocky Mountain Consultants and he recapped a <br /> history of the project for water storage and <br /> the ability to have water pumped down line to <br /> the treatment plant. The current storage <br /> at the plant will have to be refurbished at <br /> some tine end an alternate site will be needed; <br /> the Harper Lake Project will allow for this need. <br /> The general aesthetics of the lake, its dam and <br /> spillway were shown to council . The project <br /> will also involve the excavation of 1 , 230,000 <br /> cubic yards of dirt. This is an increase <br /> over the first estimate of 900,000 cubic yards of <br /> dirt. This change was made necessary by McStain ' s <br /> insistence that that a new configuration be used <br /> in the project which included a smaller but <br /> deeper reservoir which resulted in more <br /> excavation. <br /> Hosart will be accepting 140,000 cubic yards <br /> of dirt which the City would pay to haul to <br /> the site, Homsrt would then pay for the <br /> coat of grading and compacting. If . however , <br /> the city were willing pay for grading and <br /> compacting, Hosart would accept up to 610,000 <br /> cubic yards. <br /> The open space on top of Davidson Mesa was the <br /> only additional acceptable area for depositing the <br /> roesining dirt. This could be accomplished by <br /> spreading the dirt over the entire area or by <br /> S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.