Laserfiche WebLink
Roll Call Vote on the Motion to Appoint Ms. Ferris <br /> as the City Clerk: Meier, yes; Morris, yes; <br /> Fauson, yes; Johnson, yes; Leery , no; Cussen, no. <br /> By a vote of 4-2, Ferris wee appointed to the <br /> position of City Clerk. <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> APPOINTMENT Stephen Pendergraet briefly described his desires <br /> to serve on the Board of Appeals which included <br /> his opinion that it is a privilege to serve as • <br /> member of the coamunity. His background as a <br /> structural engineer would enhance his ability to <br /> make pertinent decisions. Ray Sears and Norm <br /> Laurence asked to be reappointed. Cussen moved <br /> that Pendergrast , Sears and Laurence be appointed <br /> to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for a 3 <br /> year term. Johnson seconded, and the motion <br /> carried unanimously. <br /> WINCHER ANNEXATION Ordinance #853, an ordinance annexang to the City <br /> of Louisville, Colorado, a parcel of approximately <br /> 9.9 acres located adjacent to South 80th Street <br /> which is owned by John and Mary Wincher , was read <br /> by title only. Cussen moved that Ordinance 0853 <br /> be placed for publication and that a Public <br /> Hearing be scheduled for February 19, 1985. Meier <br /> seconded, and the motion was carried unanimously. <br /> WINCHER ZONING Ordinance 0854, an ordinance amending Title 17 of <br /> the Louisville Municipal Code of the City of <br /> Louisville. Colorado entitled "Zoning", by zoning <br /> property of approximately 9.9 acres owned by John <br /> and Mary Wincher annexed to the City by Ordinance <br /> 0853. The requested zoning in this case is the <br /> new Business Office Zone . Fauson moved that <br /> Ordinance 0854 be put out for publication and that <br /> the Public Hearing be set for February 19, 1985. <br /> Johnson seconded, and the motion was carried <br /> unanimously. <br /> PETITIONS FOR <br /> INITIATIVE On January 3, 1985, the Deputy City Clerk of the <br /> City of Louisville received a petition dealing <br /> with an amendment to the Municipal Code concerning <br /> the cutting of weeds in the City. Another <br /> petition received on the ease date involved <br /> annexation and zoning of property located east of <br /> Highway 42. Both the petitions were reviewed by <br /> the City Clerk's office with respect to signatures <br /> and it was found that both petitions had enough <br /> signatures to meet the criteria. <br /> Rautenstraus related that the proposed weed <br /> ordinance does not make a large distinction <br /> between the current ordinance with respect to weed <br /> 3 <br />