My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1986 09 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1986 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1986 09 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:57 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 2:30:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
9/2/1986
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1986 09 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Wanush explained that Richard P. Siella is that <br /> owner of a 33.39 acre parcel of land. It is <br /> located on the north side of Q.S. 36 just east of <br /> the Louisville/Superior interchange on U.S. 36 and <br /> the applicant is requesting annexation to the <br /> City. Manush stated that the entire <br /> eiella/Ksnkick annexation of 114.4 acres is bring <br /> consider in three separate ordinances so that the <br /> State Statute requirement for 1/6 contiguity can <br /> be net and asked that Council relate the <br /> presentation and recommendations by staff to the <br /> entire Siella/Kenkick annexation/gosling request. <br /> Staff recommended to the Planning Commission that <br /> the Jiella/Menkick annexation request be approved <br /> (with conditions) stating that the requirements <br /> listed in the City ordinance governing annexations <br /> have been net as well as the State Statutes. The <br /> annexation and the requested coning are consistent <br /> with the Comprehensive Plan. Care should be taken <br /> to insure that this property is developed with a <br /> sensitivity to the design guidelines contained in <br /> the Comp Plan. <br /> At the duly 6th Planning Commission public <br /> bearing, Commission recommended approval of the <br /> annexation with 6 conditional 11 all water rights <br /> must be dedicated to the City; 2) all property <br /> north of U.S 36 suet be developed as a single POD; <br /> 3) ell land south of O.B. 36 suet be developed as <br /> a single MI 4) at the time of subdivision, land <br /> must be dedicated for bilee/hiks trails along <br /> Coal Creek. The specific amount of land and exact <br /> location shall be determined at the time of <br /> subdivision; 5) Until the buried storage facility <br /> is constructed on the Mesa, development on this <br /> property should be reviewed by the Public works <br /> Department to insure that adequate water service <br /> *sister 6) on the land north of U.B. 36 no <br /> structure shall exceed 35' in height and no uses <br /> requiring the outside storage of equipment or <br /> materials shall be allowed. <br /> ]ten Dell, a ' Rocky Mountain Consultants, and <br /> representative for Mr. and Kra. Stella and Mr. and <br /> Mrs. Meakick, gave a slid• presentation of the <br /> area, an overview of the land and its proposed <br /> use. <br /> George Menkick, owner of one of the parcels of <br /> land being considered for annexation, stated that <br /> nine developers and numerous realtors have <br /> contacted he and Siena over the past four years <br /> regarding possibilities of the development of this <br /> property with such things as a hotel, restaurants, <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.