Laserfiche WebLink
retail office, research park and • corporate use. <br /> During this tilos both diella and Menkick worked <br /> with the Town of Superior exclusively. !however, <br /> one developer withdrew his plan when it was deter- <br /> mined that Superior would not be in a position to <br /> serve the needed water. Another developer made a <br /> generous offer to the Town of Superior and was <br /> turned down Siena and Mbiayilti then a Superior. After these efforts, <br /> approached the City of <br /> Louisville. Menkick feels that the inclusion of • <br /> this land into the City of Louisville will still <br /> directly benefit the Town of Superior in that a <br /> waterline will be brought scram O.S. 34 almost up <br /> to Superior's boundary at no cost to them. Also, <br /> oannercial development tends to spawn other <br /> development. Superior has other quality land for <br /> their own commercial and residential development <br /> considerations. Menkick stated that this <br /> annexation will be of great benefit to the City of <br /> Louisville by expanding greatly its tax hase. <br /> Mayor tausoa asked for anyone wishing to speak in <br /> opposition to the annexation request. <br /> Jerry Mcilroy, 104 William Street, Superior, <br /> stating that it is not true that the Town of <br /> Superior turned their annexation proposal down. <br /> Negotiations may have been stalled when the Town <br /> asked that $iella/Menikick to wait until the <br /> Superior water study could be ooipleted. Mcllroy <br /> stated that it is his opinion that the Town of <br /> Superior does not want to be saved from the City <br /> of srooafield, but rather from the City of Louis- <br /> ville. Milroy feels that this could have been a <br /> win/win situation with a revenue sharing plan. <br /> This annexation will negatively affect the Town of <br /> Superior and 'a yes vote from the Council of <br /> Louisville tonight will be by no weans the last <br /> heard on this issue.' <br /> Other residents from the Town of Superior asked <br /> that the City of Louisville deny this request ap <br /> it will promote noise, pollution and increase <br /> crime due to oomatercial development. <br /> Residents of the City of Louisville opposing the <br /> annexation stated ooncerns over the crossing <br /> of O.S. 34 aMaus it as • negative to the City of <br /> Louisville. Some residents were not opposed to <br /> the inclusion of the parcel of land on the north <br /> side of the inter, but greatly opposed the <br /> annexation of the on the south side stating <br /> that other parcels are available for oommercial <br /> growth without having to cross O.e. 34. <br /> 4 <br />