My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1987 01 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1987 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1987 01 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:57 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 2:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
1/7/1987
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1987 01 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ssyaanski moved that Bondi and Company be <br /> appointed as the City's auditor. Scarpella <br /> seconded. Unanimous. <br /> ORDINANCE #918 - 'MALTS PARR ANNEXATION #1 - <br /> PUBLIC HEARING (Sackett and Anderson asked to be sxcusel from the <br /> proceedings on Ordinance #918 and Ordinance #919 <br /> due to possible conflict of interest. ) <br /> Rautenstraus read by tins only Ordinance #918, <br /> 'An Ordinance annexing to the City of Louisville, <br /> Colorado, a parcel of approximate:y 7.213 acres <br /> located north of D. S. Highway 36 and west of 88th <br /> Street which is owned by Harold M. Spicer." <br /> Proper publication and notice of publication were <br /> established. <br /> Mayor Fauson opened the public hearing. <br /> Wanush explained ts:at this as the first of two <br /> annexation ordinances annexing the Spicer property <br /> by the Adventist Health System for the purposes of <br /> constructing a full service hospital and health <br /> complex. Two ordinances are needed to comply with <br /> the statutory requirement for }/b contiguity to <br /> the existing City limits. Planning Commission <br /> reviewed this annexation and found that it <br /> complied with ail state statutes and City <br /> ordinances. They recommend that the City Council <br /> approve the annexation with the following condi- <br /> tions: ;.) the future d,-velopment of this entire <br /> parcel should be subject to a single PUD; 2) ;ill <br /> water rf.ghts should be dedicated to the City (1 <br /> share of South Boulder and Coal Creek and 1 share <br /> of Lake). In addition, if during the PUD <br /> process it is concluded that total water use of <br /> the fully developed health park is greater than <br /> tLe water rights dedicated plus the amount of <br /> wttct able to be purchased with 57% of the tap <br /> fees, the developer shall pay the City that <br /> difference. tees toward tre purchase of needed <br /> raw vater should be prepaid on a schedule to be <br /> determined at the time of PUD; 3) at the time of <br /> subdivision and PVD, • 12% land dedication, or <br /> cash in lieu, should be made, 4) all costs of <br /> extending service to the property shall be born <br /> by the developer; and 5) at the time of PUD, a <br /> traffic study should be completed by the applicant <br /> to determine the traffic impacts of the completed <br /> facility on Dillon Road, South 88th St. and other <br /> roads and facilities in the area. <br /> Wanush outlined the criteria established by both <br /> State Statutes and by City Ordinance when <br /> considering annexation. Wanush stated that all of <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.