Laserfiche WebLink
the City's 1986 annual audit. rive of those firms <br /> responded to the request from which staff then <br /> selected three for interviews with the Finance <br /> Committee members on Jovember 12th. <br /> Szymanski briefed Council on the interviews the <br /> Finance Committee had with the three firms: <br /> Fortner. Baynes, Lsvkulich i Co. (the City's <br /> current auditors), Edwards i Oliver, and Bondi i <br /> Company. The main consideration of the Committee <br /> was the firm's knowledge, experience and <br /> .expertise, resources, ability to do the job, and <br /> which firm could potentially provide the most <br /> benefit to the City of Louisville. The <br /> recommendation of the Finance Committee to Council <br /> is to appoint Bondi a Company as the City's <br /> Annual Auditor fo- 1986. <br /> Douglas Oliver, 226 Juniper, addressed Council <br /> stating that he was one of the three firms • <br /> interviewed for the City's audit. Mr. Oliver <br /> expressed his disappointment in not being selected <br /> as the firm was qualified and the "price was <br /> right." The firm is located in Louisville it 932 <br /> Walnut St. <br /> Mayor Fauson askid if Mr. Oliver is currently <br /> auditing any municipalities. Mr. Oliver stated <br /> that he was not, however, he had been the auditor <br /> for the City of Brighton for two years and has ten <br /> years audit experience. <br /> Szymanski stated that the Committee felt it was in <br /> the City's best interest to have a firm that has <br /> everyday experience in municipal auditing and <br /> Bondi and Co. met thin requirement. They have <br /> multiple resources and audit for several cities. <br /> We would like to keep our City's money in the <br /> City wherever possible. But we also have to <br /> consider what the City is paying for and what it <br /> is getting...and we have to spend the City's money <br /> wisely. ' <br /> :undley stated that City staff was satisfied with <br /> the work that the City's current auditing firm has <br /> performed to' the past six years. It was time to <br /> look at alternative proposals and is appropriate <br /> to do that every few years just to make sure that <br /> the City is getting "the biggest bank for its <br /> buck. " <br /> 2 <br />