My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1987 01 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1987 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1987 01 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:57 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 2:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
1/7/1987
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1987 01 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
to '.o and 1 urge that you support it...with the <br /> Agricultural zoning. " <br /> Another individual spoke stating that he was not <br /> opposing the annexation and the development of the <br /> health park, however, he felt the type of <br /> employment it would bring to Louisville would not <br /> necessarily employ current Louisville residents. <br /> Doctors and other professionals would be employed <br /> by the health park and they most likely would not <br /> live in Louisville. <br /> Mohr stated that this is the kind of thing <br /> everyone is happy to see happen as it will bring <br /> and attract other kinds of industry and other <br /> kinds of businesses to Louisville. Mohr felt that <br /> this would create different types of job, <br /> ultimately employing 1500 people and regardless of <br /> whether or c:t they live in Louisville, they will <br /> certainly spend money in Louisville. <br /> Szymanski stated that this is a tremendous benefit <br /> to the City of Louisville and is happy that they <br /> chose Louisville to locate in. Szymanski is <br /> equally happy that this all worked out under <br /> Agricultural toning. <br /> Szymanski asked' '+ianush how much of this property <br /> is within the so called 1,500 ft. buffer?" <br /> u.:nush stated that all of it is. Szymanski asked <br /> if the strict 1,500 ft. buffet were adhered to, <br /> this project could not come about, wanush stated <br /> that this was correct. Szymanski ..sked about <br /> providing water and sewer services and the <br /> difficulty of providing them. 8undley stated that <br /> at the time of the development, which is unknown <br /> at this point, the commitment .n the annexation <br /> agreeaent is that the City and the Health Park <br /> will work together to get the services provided. <br /> Until the ties of the PUD, Hundley stated, it is <br /> uncertain as to what portioi,s of the center would <br /> be taxed or tax exempt from property tax. <br /> However, there would be sales tax generated by the <br /> project and there would be the spin-offs that are <br /> normally associated on a 3-1 basis for a facility <br /> like this -- '. jobs are created for every 1 basic <br /> job that • hospital would create. <br /> Carnival stated that with proper attitude we can <br /> attract business to the City of Louiaville and I <br /> appreciate being a pa4t of that positive attitude <br /> and a group that projects that. " <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.