Laserfiche WebLink
Sackett also voiced concerns regarding the landscape <br /> screening of the center, especially along the east <br /> side. Sackett preferred a wooden barrier (fence) <br /> plus landscaping at least part of the way down the <br /> east side of the center as it would provide <br /> immediate visual screening, whereas plantings will <br /> take time to grow and fill in. "We don't know <br /> what's going to be on the east side and I am <br /> concerned about the view that people are going to <br /> have in the residential area....I think it is a <br /> good use for the property and it looks like it is <br /> professionally done. But I want to make sure that <br /> we save the integrity of the neighborhood at the <br /> same time.• <br /> Sackett moved that the Resolution be approved with <br /> the amendment that from the north side of the <br /> storage yard to the point at which that storage yard <br /> meets the building, both a wooden fence and <br /> landscaping would be done. <br /> Mayor Fauaon questioned the need to use both a <br /> wooden fence on one side and chain link on the <br /> remainder of the sides. <br /> Mohr stated that this proposal seems to be consis- <br /> tent with the guidelines adopted regarding stan- <br /> dards for buildings, fences, sites, etc. and <br /> doesn't understand Sackett's reasoning regarding <br /> the wooden fence and what it would accomplish that <br /> the living screen couldn't provide if appro- <br /> priately done. •It seems to me we have put these <br /> gentlemen's feet to the fire to the point where <br /> they've got the message that we expect a living <br /> screen to be appropriately done and I hear a <br /> commitment coming from them in that regard.* <br /> Sackett stated that he feels the living screen will <br /> work, however, it will work better 10 years from <br /> now. In the meantime, a wooden fence would screen <br /> the area and provide a nice backdrop for the <br /> landscaping outlined. <br /> Mayor Fauson seconded the motion Sackett proposed. <br /> By Roll Call, Vote the motion was defeated 5-1. with <br /> Sackett voting yes. <br /> Mohr moved that Resolution 423 be approved as pre- <br /> sented. Szymanski seconded. By Roll Call Vote <br /> Resolution 423 was adopted 5-1, Sackett voted no. <br /> RESOLUTION 424 - SPECIAL REVIEW USE - CHERRY STREET TECHNICAL PARK <br /> SUBDIVISION Rautenstraus read in its entirety Resolution 424, 'A <br /> Resolution approving a Special Review Use for Cherry <br /> Street Technical Park. ' <br /> 8 <br />