Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> RESOLUTION $22 - PUBLIC HEARING - FINDING OF PACTS AND <br /> CONCLUSIONS - MENZICX WEST ANNEXATION <br /> PETITION Hundley explained that on Monday, staff set with <br /> representatives from the Town of Superior regarding <br /> the annexation that is being proposed. The dis- <br /> cussions were very fruitful and it appears that <br /> there is a good possibility that an agreement could <br /> be worked out that is mutually beneficial to both <br /> parties. Bundley stated that today, to ensure that <br /> Superior's interests were met, the City of Louis- <br /> ville was served with a summons for District Court <br /> Action which is the next step whenever you have two <br /> parties who are proposing to annex the same piece of <br /> property. As a result, all further proceedings are <br /> to be held in abeyance. Consequently, Rundley re- <br /> quested that Council continue the public hearing <br /> until October 6, 1987, which would enable the City <br /> to further negotiate with the Town of Superior to <br /> reach a settlement on this issue. The annexation <br /> and zoning ordinances for the 1.8 acre Menkick <br /> Parcel were pulled from the Agenda tonight as a <br /> result and will be postponed until the continuation- <br /> of the public hearing on this Resolution. <br /> Mayor Fauson opened the public hearing and suggested <br /> that in light of the facts surrounding the issue, <br /> the public hearing be continued to the October 6, <br /> 1987, Council Meeting. Mohr moved that the public <br /> hearing for Resolution 822 be continued to the <br /> October 6, 1987, City Council Meeting. Anderson <br /> seconded. <br /> Sackett asked that Hundley explain how the City <br /> became involved in court proceedings with the Town <br /> of Superior. <br /> Hundley explained that the right-of-way along <br /> McCaslin Boulevard is what is in question. The <br /> annexation petition from George and Xyung Menkick <br /> includes 1.8 acres of property and the right-of-way <br /> of McCaslin Blvd. Since that property fronts <br /> XcCaslin, staff felt there was an interest on the <br /> part of Louisville to insure proper access to that <br /> property, insure certain standards were met in terms <br /> of road construction and as a result felt it <br /> important to consider annexing McCaslin Blvd. <br /> Sackett stated that it is important to understand <br /> that the City already has valuable commercial land <br /> on McCaslin Blvd. as a result of an annexation in <br /> 1986. If the road isn't constructed properly, that <br /> land could be less accessible. This is not an <br /> attempt by the City of Louisville to make things <br /> difficult for the City of Superior. <br /> 6 <br />