Laserfiche WebLink
goes into debt, under the theory that loss - purchases weren't <br /> really a debt obligation, that the City could back out of it at •n <br /> time. You legally can back out, but the credit bureaus all <br /> remember you did. Debt is something that requires voter approval. <br /> Kayer moved that Council approve ordinance No. 1041, Series 1992, <br /> an ordinance prohibiting financinq of real or personal property for <br /> governmental or proprietary purposes through lease- purchase or <br /> long -tern lease agreements and set Public Searing for September 1, <br /> 1992. Seconded by Hornbostel. Roil call was taken. Notion passed <br /> by a 7 -0 vote. <br /> PROPOSZD AN3N MITS TO sysoivrSxoK AND puD s=10 r or Pero 00as <br /> Mayer stated that using the Subdivision Code itself is not the best <br /> way to bring in large significant developments. There are very few <br /> controls that the City has on such developments. He recommended <br /> that the City amend the Subdivision ordinance such that any <br /> subdivision with more than five housing units shall be required to <br /> submit a PUD plan and be subject to the sections in the pUD <br /> Ordinance to ensure that the large housing subdivisions that come <br /> into the City will be of high quality. <br /> Davidson: Are we allowed to do that? <br /> Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, stated that she saw Nayer's <br /> proposal just the day before and had not been able to go over all <br /> of the legal issues related to it. She'll go over the issues and <br /> get a response to the Council along with a draft of the ordinance, <br /> if Council would like. The one concern she has is to ensure that <br /> the requirement complies with the PUD State Statute, which sate out <br /> a series of requirements that apply to the PUD process. one is <br /> that all of the developuent in a City cannot be required to go <br /> through a PUD process. <br /> Davidson: Tom (Kayer) , the intent for the five <br /> units or less, it Susan, in her <br /> reviewing it, found out it needed to <br /> be 20 or 25 units or less, that <br /> still meet& your basic intent? <br /> Mayers Certainly. A full PUD review night <br /> be an onerous burden on the very <br /> small developer. For any <br /> development that is going to have a <br /> significant impact on the City, it <br /> would be worthwhile to protect the <br /> City's interest. One could adopt <br /> many of the PUD proposals in the <br /> Subdivision Ordinance, but it's more <br /> straight forward to just adopt the <br /> PUD procedures it. total. <br /> 7 <br />