Laserfiche WebLink
4riffithat Right now the FW Ordinance requires <br /> all Residential soned districts to <br /> be under this PUD process, if they <br /> are 40 acres or more. I'm assuming <br /> that what you Mould like to do is to <br /> reduca that 40 acres or more dawn to <br /> a smaller number. <br /> Mayers It might have to be done both in <br /> terms of land or density. I'll rely <br /> on you to determine that. <br /> Gritfithes I understand the policy that you're <br /> trying to address. If Council would <br /> like to have a draft prepared along <br /> those lines, I'll look at the <br /> Statutes and Ordinances and discuss <br /> it further with Councilman xayer and <br /> cote back with an ordinance that <br /> would reflect those concerns. <br /> Davidsont is the intent of this to apply to <br /> areas currently annexed to the City, <br /> but don't have an approve plat.? <br /> KaYOrt It would apply to anything that <br /> hadn't been formally platted. <br /> Davidson called for Council comments or questions. <br /> Iathropt I's havipq difficulty justifying the <br /> coments wade by Councilman Mayer as <br /> tar as what the purpose and the end <br /> result would be in adopting such a <br /> change. I'm not sure of the intent <br /> hare. The blarden that you would <br /> transfer to a small or medium sited <br /> developer on a properly zoned parcel <br /> of land in Louisville is not <br /> warranted. We would just be addinq <br /> the expenses of the PUD filing, <br /> separate drawings, extra consultants <br /> to do work that really doesn't <br /> justify the need. To make someone <br /> go through a POD gyration, when it <br /> isn't warranted,. I have difficulty <br /> with. <br /> layers I disagree with Rob. In looking <br /> through the case law that Susan <br /> submitted to us, I found that those <br /> findings in the subdivision process <br /> • <br />