Laserfiche WebLink
against any class of building. I <br /> want to make sure that those who <br /> reall place the demand on the <br /> facilities and are creating the <br /> demand for new facilities and <br /> resources pay their way. <br /> Griffiths felt that those were adequate justifications, if the <br /> facts support them. <br /> Sisk: Our tap fees have been well below <br /> the actual cost of the cost that we <br /> need to provide raw water to our <br /> citizens. I would encourage Council <br /> to look at an $8,000.00 range, just <br /> from the standpoint of the cost of <br /> water. Also, we're talking about <br /> increasing the park dedication fee <br /> to a dollar per sq. ft. As far as <br /> the other fees, going to a total of <br /> $2.60 per sq. ft. As far as a <br /> discussion item, I would appreciate <br /> comments from Council on by our <br /> increasing population, does it make <br /> any sense to increase and add a sq. <br /> ft. charge for library expansion of <br /> $.15 - $.20 per sq. ft.? It would <br /> be under City Council's control. <br /> Howard: A largo portion of our Library <br /> utilization problem is from outside <br /> the City of Louisville. Without <br /> addr *ssing the problem of other <br /> cities and communities using our <br /> library as a regional library and <br /> not paying for it as a regional <br /> library, we're placing too high a <br /> burden on our citizens. It's giving <br /> benefit to the boulder County, <br /> Lafayette, Broomfield, and Superior. <br /> I would support a measure to ensure <br /> that the Library can expand and <br /> maintain an adequate book stock, if <br /> at the same time, we found a way to <br /> address the real core problem of how <br /> Louisville can get a fairer share of <br /> the cost burden distributed, where <br /> it ought to be distributed among the <br /> out of town citizens, as well as our <br /> own citizens. <br /> siski It's the price we pay for having a <br /> 13 <br />