My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 09 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 09 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:03:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
9/1/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 09 01
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.) if the tap fees for multi- tamilies are equal to the tap <br /> fees for single faailios, suiti- family housing will be <br /> virtually eliminated in this community. This raises the <br /> question of diversity of housing and population. where <br /> do the young people got where do the lose fortunate, <br /> that can 't get the high paying jobs go? Affordable <br /> housing will become sxtinot, by eliminating any <br /> differential in multi - family tap fees, Louisville may be <br /> discriminating. <br /> Lathrop was very concerned that the discussions had not included <br /> the key players, the development community. It Louisville does <br /> raise fees, increase land dedication, and building drops <br /> dramatically, therm Louisville hasn't accomplished anything. <br /> Lathrop asked Council to stop its fee structure at a Ruch lower <br /> level. <br /> stayer: It Louisville is on the edge, I <br /> would like to know why we're on a <br /> rate of building 400 houses? We are <br /> the fastest growing community in the <br /> north Denver metro area, with the <br /> exclusion of Westminster. We're <br /> building more houses than the City <br /> of Mulder, who has a population of <br /> more than five tines our size. <br /> Diversity of housing is a concern. <br /> Y an concerned about overly rapid <br /> grovtli, which can be a mask of a <br /> problem. When you have a lot of <br /> building permits, you can dam up a <br /> lot of money in the front end years. <br /> Those debts, bonds, bond holders <br /> want to be paid 15 - 20 years from <br /> now. It we go at anything <br /> approximating this current rate, we <br /> would be built out in seven years. <br /> Our debts go on 10 - 30 years into <br /> the future. we are currently <br /> subsidizing some of that debt with <br /> an assessment fee on the voter /sewer <br /> bill. We've had to acquire more <br /> well water and build a new water <br /> treatment plant. If we've had the <br /> high lees, where are the new parks? <br /> A new park hasn't been built in 10 <br /> years. We're building 35 houses per <br /> month on average. Every month we <br /> wait on this, if we talk about a <br /> $1,000.00 tap fee increa", that's <br /> $3S,OQ0.00 per month lost. If it's <br /> $2400.00, that's $70.000.00 per <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.