Laserfiche WebLink
$4,000.00, I don't know. Taking <br /> into account wbat councihsan Sisk <br /> said, I Mound propose usirrq the <br /> number $2.7d for the service <br /> aYpansion fee, $8,000.00 for the <br /> water tap, 154 for the open spaoa <br /> dedication, and the differential <br /> between multi - family and single <br /> family. If staff can ahem that <br /> multi - family doesn't use...... if <br /> we're un jikstifiod in that, then I <br /> would want to know that. In filling <br /> in the blank& in our r nded <br /> first draft of the ordinanco, those <br /> okra the nuuabers I would propose to <br /> put out to publish avA gat public <br /> consent on at the next Council <br /> meeting. <br /> Brand: On the aulti- family, we've been <br /> working since the last joint session <br /> mitts the Planninq Commission to loop <br /> at what using the same fees for <br /> aulti - family does. It is going to <br /> restrict multi- fasily in the City. <br /> The land that is available won't <br /> support the additional multi - family. <br /> That has an inpact on host zany <br /> building permits we would have <br /> totally ana paying the bills. <br /> Nayer: Mr. mayor, that's how I would <br /> propose putting the ordinance out <br /> for publication, that we hold a <br /> public hearing on it at the <br /> Septasmbor i Council a"tinq, take in <br /> the public cosa+nt, and either go <br /> with those figures, if no one gives <br /> us reason to adjust them or &send <br /> them as necessary. <br /> Davidson: Is that a motion? <br /> Mayors That's a notion. <br /> Seconded by Howard. <br /> Sisk offered a friendly aaandsont. that the ordinance be situated in <br /> such a way that it be dons as an •aergency ordinance. <br /> Mayer accepted that. Seconder, Howard, accepted that. <br /> 22 <br />