Laserfiche WebLink
ariffithat For clarification, are you <br /> euggestinq that this draft ordinance <br /> be adopted on first reading tonight <br /> or are you saying bring it back on <br /> the September 1 meeting for the <br /> first reading? <br /> Sisk: Right. <br /> Brands Then it wouldn't be a public hearing <br /> on September 1. <br /> Mayer: It won't be a public hearing. If we <br /> could go With it as an emergency <br /> ordinance, then I would like that. <br /> Sisk: That's why I was suggesting that. <br /> Davidson: It has been :roved and seconded to <br /> direct the City Attorney to bring <br /> forth an ordinance at the September <br /> 1 Council meeting with the figures <br /> you (Mayer) mentioned, as she has <br /> presented it here in draft fora, <br /> with the exception that 2" water tap <br /> is not $5,110.00 as it is shown <br /> here. It is $52,120.00. <br /> Lathrop: To more accurately answer <br /> Councilwoman HornbostelIs inquiry as <br /> to where we fit as far as other <br /> communities go, with the proposal as <br /> presented, in a rough calculation of <br /> a 15% land dedication instead of <br /> 124, a $2,000.00 increase in the tap <br /> foe, and $1,000.00 increase in the <br /> service expansion tee, that would <br /> make us the highest fee community <br /> among Louisville, Boulder, <br /> Lafayette, Broomfield, Longmont, and <br /> Superior. To the extent of <br /> $11,000.00 more than Boulder, <br /> $9,000.00 more than Broomfield, <br /> $9,000.00 more than Lafayette, <br /> $11,000.00 more than Longmont, and <br /> roughly equal to Superior including <br /> their notro district assessment. <br /> Mayer objected to the Superior figures. He felt that they were <br /> underestimated for comparison purposes. For the same size lots, <br /> Louisville is still lower than Superior. <br /> 23 <br />