Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ..., <br />Hornbostel: I think you are really confusing the issue. My <br /> understanding of this is that if we do annex them, we <br /> can't provide them the zoning if they want commercial. <br />Sackett: That is what I am saying, we understand that. No <br /> promises. They can still annex if they want. <br />Hornbostel: Would they have vested rights in open space? <br />Sackett: It can be used for what it is right now, agriculture. <br />Hornbostel: What does the contract say as far as current uses? <br />Griffiths: It says that whatever uses are currently being made of <br /> the property, they can continue to make of the property. <br /> In addition, my recollection of it is, whatever other uses <br /> are permitted under the current zoning they could make <br /> of the property. The limitation of the agreement is if <br /> you change those currently permitted uses to something <br /> else. That says you can't do it unless you get an <br /> amendment to the plan. <br />Howard: They would have to annex as agricultural? <br />Griffiths: Or the uses that are currently permitted, yes. <br />Fauson: John, if we proceed to the next step is there much of a <br /> cost to the City or the Neumann's? <br />Franklin: No, there is still a window where the Neumann's would <br /> be free to withdraw, however, when they choose to <br /> formally proceed to the Planning Commission then they <br /> begin to pay fees and invest money. <br />Hornbostel: I don't think it would hurt to put this off until the next <br /> meeting. If they go to the Planning Commission and we <br /> send it on they will have fees to pay. <br />Fauson: No, they don't. That is what I was acquiring about, <br /> Margaret, was what would be the cost for going to the <br /> next step? Mrs. Neumann can talk to Mr. Neumann and <br /> if they want to withdraw before there is any initial cost <br /> to them or to the City then they can withdraw or <br /> proceed. <br /> S <br />