My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 07 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2010 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 07 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:05:01 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 11:35:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
7/6/2010
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C2
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2010 07 06
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
June 22, 2010 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />City Manager Fleming explained the City’s budget is the most significant policy <br />considered by the Louisville City Council each year; it establishes the City’s <br />priorities and provides funding to achieve those priorities. Based on public <br />comments and City Council discussion and direction during this meeting, staff will <br />begin preparing the recommended budget for Council consideration in October. <br />Finance Director Kevin Watson explained the 2011 Capital Improvement budget <br />has been formulated based on assumptions about anticipated revenue and <br />expected expenditures over a five year period. Those assumptions drive the <br />projections of changes in fund balance. He reviewed the 2010 Revenue Trend <br />Dashboard for the General Fund and compared the 2009 actual revenue with the <br />2010 trend. He outlined the assumptions and targets affecting each fund over the <br />2010-2015 year period and noted a reduction in the water utility user fee. He <br />reviewed the expected expenditures targets, which were reduced due to the <br />reduction in the total salaries and wages and employees’ benefits. <br />Deputy City Manager Balser clarified the use tax discussed in the financial model <br />is a construction use tax. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Bruce Becker, 533 Coal Creek Lane, Louisville, CO asked whether the fiscal <br />assumption included federal stimulus money. Finance Director Watson <br />explained the City did not receive any federal stimulus money and therefore, he <br />only looked at the local economy. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella inquired whether the development fees were included. <br />Finance Director Watson confirmed development fees were included in the <br />model. He reviewed the forecasts for the General Fund, Conservation Trust <br />Fund, Capital Projects Fund and Combined Utility Funds. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Sisk inquired about the increased rates of employee benefits, medical, <br />retirements and FICA. City Manager Fleming explained the City has shifted a lot <br />of the rate increases to the City employees. <br />Mayor Sisk explained his concern centers on runaway expenses. He asked if <br />there was a way to have a cap on benefits. City Manager Fleming explained <br />Staff could look at other municipalities to see how their employees are benefited. <br />Mayor Sisk inquired about the projection of property taxes for ConocoPhillips. <br />Finance Director Watson confirmed they are built into the model. <br />28 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.