My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 07 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2010 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 07 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:05:01 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 11:35:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
7/6/2010
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C2
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2010 07 06
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
June 22, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />Councilor Dalton asked if the current assumption provides no new employees. <br />Finance Director Watson confirmed there are no new employees in the model. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO shared Mayor <br />Sisk’s concern over insurance benefits. He addressed high deductible insurance <br />coverage and stated health insurance is an expense for anyone who works. <br />Bruce Becker, 533 Coal Creek Lane, Louisville, CO concurred with Mr. Menaker <br />and addressed federal mandated health care coverage. <br />Councilor Muckle arrived at 4:37 p.m. <br />City Manager Fleming confirmed there was Council consensus to accept the <br />budget assumptions. <br />Results of Phone Poll on Use Tax Issues and Discussion/Direction on Use <br />Tax Ballot Measure <br />City Manager Fleming briefly outlined the results of the Use Tax telephone poll. <br />He requested Council discussion and direction on whether staff should prepare <br />an ordinance to place a use tax question on the November ballot. <br />Mayor Sisk noted the Use Tax question has failed twice and since a number of <br />projects were cut from the budget it is now a question for the citizens. <br />Councilor Sackett noted the City is trying to operate on less. He voiced his belief <br />a use tax question on the ballot will not be approved by the voters and the <br />services, which were cut, will not come back. <br />Councilor Dalton stated the City can make a case for supporting the use tax, but <br />noted the loss of fireworks has not affected the public. He reported Boulder <br />Valley School District proposes to put a property tax increase on the ballot this <br />fall. <br />Councilor Clabots reported hearing from constituents who want the fireworks, but <br />think the City should partner with the corporate sector rather than propose a use <br />tax. He felt in the present economic climate, citizens will not support a use tax. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Gail Wetrogren, 930 McKinley Avenue, Louisville, CO voiced her belief the use <br />tax has not been well explained and is not understood by the public. She felt a <br />lot of work would have to be put into selling the public on a use tax. <br />29 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.