My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 06 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 06 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 8:43:52 AM
Creation date
8/4/2010 12:44:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 06 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 13, 2010 <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />Staff reviewed the project using the special review use criteria and found all five <br />(5) criteria have been met. <br />Staff recommends approval of the request, with the following conditions: <br />1. Barriers shall be placed on the mid block curb cut on Pine Street to <br />prevent access to the building. Staff shall work with the applicant to <br />determine the design of the barriers. <br />2. The applicant shall place dust free surfacing on the western parking area, <br />and stripe for 8 parking spaces. <br />3. The outdoor patio shall not be used past 12 a.m. on any given day. <br />4. This SRU is granted to the applicant only and may be assigned or <br />exchanged at the time of any transfer or sale. <br />Commission Questions of Staff. <br />O'Connell asked for a clarification of a curb cut. <br />McCartney explained a curb cut is a drivewa p onto a pr <br />Russell asked what would be historical o site. <br />McCartney stated any building 50+ years iggers a review by the Historic <br />Preservation Commission. <br />Sheets asked if a sidewalk is better than a curba..at. <br />McCartney explained there is a si <br />building and the curb cut is perpen <br />access to the inside o - age ar' <br />the curb cut would - • is` •itiona <br />Applicant Pres- <br />Chad Sholders, <br />following: <br />a14�,��rning pa to south side of the <br />lar to the buildi d is used to allow <br />continued by stating the removal of <br />reet parking. <br />701 Main Street, stated the <br />1) • inin. •erience de. - ds on the patio space. <br />2 - owne he .. g desires to keep the curb cut because the project <br />oes not use e enti ;uare footage of the building. The owners wants <br />option to use the cu ut in the future. <br />3) •atio space will be re -designed and reflected on the site plan to <br />inc• ate the 30' x 30' site triangle requirement. <br />4) The u _ _ as for the parking at the rear of the building will increase <br />the need for a ional air conditioning of the building. He and the owner of <br />the building, i cooperation with the City, would like to find an alternative <br />dust free surface. <br />5) The closing time for the patio is planned for 2:00 A.M. <br />Commission Questions of Staff and Applicant: <br />McCartney discussed LMC 9.34.010.B.1 regarding the hours of operation as it <br />relates to the noise ordinance. He stated the Planning Commission has the <br />option to modify the hours of operation. <br />Sholders stated all mechanical devices will be turned off at midnight. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.