My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 9:21:22 AM
Creation date
8/5/2010 12:16:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 07 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 10, 2010 <br />Page 12 of 12 <br />➢ 1301 Empire Rd — Louisville Storage Center — A final planned unit <br />development (PUD) to construct a self storage and mobile storage facility. <br />The project will include approximately 300 self storage units ranging in <br />size from 5'x5' to 10'x30'. The mobile storage units (similar to PODS, Pack <br />Rat, etc.) consist of 8' tall containers that are 71/2' wide and 8', 12' or 16' <br />long. <br />➢ Discussion — Direction — Special Review Use (SRU) Administrative <br />Review Criteria <br />Sheets noted she would not be able to attend the July meeting. <br />McCartney briefly reviewed the tentative schedule with the following information: <br />• City Solar Panels will be three SRU reviews for the three water treatments <br />sites. It is possible they will be heard in August instei,,,Qf July. <br />• Takoda might be moved to the August me4ting. <br />• 1301 Empire Rd is tracking for the Jul meeting. <br />• Staff is currently working on the dministrative Review Criteria for a <br />discussion — direction at the July m; g <br />Planning Commission Comments <br />Loo discussed her concerns regarding the revie process the Commission has <br />been using for the restaurant patio cases. She is not sure each case has the <br />same review criteria. She cited examples oftie of the differences between the <br />most recent cases reviewed by the Commi <br />McCartney explained the difference and why each prr ject is reviewed on a case <br />by case basis because of the material submitted by the applicant and the <br />discussions between staff and the applic <br />report and documen <br />prior to the development of the staff <br />mission hearing. <br />Lipton discussed a pre . Planning • mission Work Plan developed by the <br />Planning Commissio an• -ul Wood, former Planning Director. He requested <br />the add a discsion / • tion business item to the July meeting for the <br />purp• •f reviewing the previ• Work Plan. <br />Staff Co - nts <br />None hear <br />Discussion Ite <br />None heard. <br />Next Regular Meeting July 8, 2010 <br />Adjourn <br />Loo moved and Sheets seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. Lipton <br />adjourned the meeting at 9:20 P.M. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.