My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 9:21:22 AM
Creation date
8/5/2010 12:16:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 07 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 10, 2010 <br />Page 11 of 12 <br />Menaker: Not worried about only allowing the existing signs that don't conform, <br />but to all signs similar to the existing. Concerned about not allowing internally <br />illuminated signs would hurt the recommendation for marquee signs. <br />Illumination: <br />Lipton: What is missing is samples from Pearl Street Mall showing the extreme, <br />but not middle of the road. Use Pearl Street regulations for neon. Provide more <br />"meat" in this section. <br />Russell: Unique neon is cool. Store bought signs should not be permitted. Could <br />we tie sign type to certain uses? i.e. Marquees for music/ ters, etc. <br />Loo: Neon — what about neon in window signs. Does ount towards window <br />sign allowance? <br />Russ: It should. <br />Lipton: We should show latitude similar to Illumination shout be more <br />subtle for downtown. Bring back at next mee ing, full illumination p ntation <br />Loo: Include internally illuminated signs in present <br />Sheets: I think we are trudging in fashion police . far as signs are concerned. <br />Russell: I am not sure how we g that. C- e have performance <br />standards on signs? i.e. If someth is en, the auld be required to fix. <br />Next meeting informati• . t: <br />• Illumination: <br />i. Inte umin_ — nialliictures <br />ii. Ot ypes of it <br />iii. Con• and <br />• Pe • 's ance tandards of igns <br />• ign <br />Pla • Commiss • equested additional review of the following topics when <br />the Ordinance comes and for review: <br />• Awning <br />• Corner Lo <br />• Multi-te — same building <br />• Murals <br />The following items are tentatively scheduled for July 8, 2010 <br />➢ City Solar Panels — A special review use (SRU) request to install solar <br />panels at the three (3) water treatment plants owned and operated by the <br />City of Louisville. <br />➢ Takoda GDP, PUD and Plat amendments — A revision request to the <br />general development plan (GDP), the final subdivision plat (FP) and the <br />final planned unit development (PUD). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).