Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 08

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 10, 2010 Page 6 of 12 Sheets discussed her concern regarding the reduction in parking requirement. She sees no compelling reason to change. Russ discussed the analysis used to determine the parking reduction. He continued by explaining the current parking utilization is 1:662 while the maximum observed parking ratio was 1:532. Russell and Russ discussed the 1:500 parking ratio and the utilization rate resulting from the maximum use of parking. Russell stated the revised ratio would serve as a guide for Planning Commission as the city moves forward with additional downtown development. Sheets asked if there be enough parking when the number of patrons increase. Russ discussed another aspect of the parking ratioegardie walkability factor and how it contributes to a reduced parkinglratio. Russell, Lipton and Loo stated their under ding of the parkinduction to help clarify for Sheets the reduced parki tio. Members of the Public: Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Chokecherry Dr, ssed the utilization of existing parking spaces and if a space is empty is it cost to the City. He stated an important thing to remember is the City ow the property at 637 Front Street and it has always been the intention to utiliz site for structured parking when the demand is warranted. Staff Summary and Recommendation: No additional comments heard. Public Hearin • Closed Commission Com nts: Sheets stated her c• - • parking requirement and not fully understanding why the ed to be an odifications. Prit - . stated hetppo - recommended changes presented by staff. Lipto ted he supports the _ mmendations. He continued with a brief history of the c t parking ratio and as more density is added then the parking demand w ange and will also require more efficient parking. Loo stated he concerns expres of the code amendments and she understands the y Sheets. Russell stated he is very supportive of the recommended code amendments. He stated the 1:500 is sufficient for now but might change in ten (10) years. He also agrees with staff regarding now is the right time for a Parking Action Plan. Sheets asked Russell if the ratio is reduced, where do you build more parking in ten (10) years. Russell stated the need will be for better managed parking. The code changes will not eliminate excess but it does close the gap between need and supply.