Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 16

Home Browse Search

Williams agreed with the others but stated the second floor window (the additional window) should be removed and restored to single window. Muckle agreed with Williams comment regarding the window. Muckle made a motion to approve the application based on architectural and social significance. Lewis seconded the motion. Kerotje added a friendly amendment to state the application is for the original house footprint only motion does not landmark the later additions. The motion carried 5 0. Public Hearing Landmark Application 1131 Jefferson Koertje opened public hearing. McCartney presented staff report and PowerPoint presentation. McCartney closed by recommending approval of case because the structure had architectural and social significance. Muckle asked staff if there were any recent photos. McCartney stated staff had mistakenly not includ the Commission the house look xx most exactly t e same as the 1948 Assessor's photo. Janice Hoffman, applicant, presented her c House has not changed doors and nd5w a all the same. House material is currently stucco and stucco is the original material used at time of construction. She would like to get the drainage cQ(rected around the foundation. She has no plans for future additions #fir alterations. Would like entire structure landmarked. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes July 19, 2010 Page 3 of 6 cent photos, but assured stated the following: Koertje asked Hoffmx she had any preference for the name of the house (presented as Jacoe ouse). Hoffman stated she did xxxxxxxt have a preference but stated Connaroe House might be better. Public Comments U ih one heard Koertje closed the public hearing Commission Questions and Comments Muckle stated the social significance is strong. She also stated the architectural integrity is great. A 1932 era landmark would be great to have in town.