My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 06 21 APPROVED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 06 21 APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:24 PM
Creation date
9/10/2010 8:37:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2010 06 21 APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 21, 2010 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />Scott Eichorn, applicant, presented his case and asked the Commission if they <br />had any questions. He stated the following regarding the structures integrity: <br /> <br /> Recreated the original porch by using historical photos. <br /> <br /> House has original stained wood trim. <br /> <br /> Windows and doors are in original location. <br />Muckle asked if Eichorn had the original photos of the porch for the Commission <br />to view. <br />Eichorn stated the photos were at home. He also stated he had matched the <br />porch to the photos as closely as possible. <br />Muckle asked if the windows were in good shape. <br />Eichorn answered the windows are aluminum clad. If landmarked, he would like <br />to replace the windows. <br />Muckle asked Eichorn if he considered restoring existing windows instead of <br />replacing. <br />Eichorn stated he has looked into the restoration cost and they were quite <br />expensive. <br />Muckle asked if the siding was original. <br />Eichorn stated the siding is aluminum. Under that is asbestos siding and under <br />that is the original siding. <br />Koertje asked when was the rear addition completed. <br />Eichorn stated it was completed in 2008 and is approximately 500 SF. <br />Muckel asked how many families had owned the house. <br />Eichorn stated a handful. He stated he was okay with the house being called the <br />“Zarini House”. <br />Public Comments – none heard <br />Koertje closed the public hearing <br />Commission Questions and Comments <br />Stewart stated he liked the house, believed it retained its architectural integrity <br />and mentioned the outhouse should be landmarked as well. <br />Koertje stated the applicant could always come back to request landmarking of <br />outhouse. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.