Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 21, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br />Stewart stated he was concerned about the existing siding and believed the <br />original siding should be restored. He also stated the social significance was <br />important. <br />Lewis stated she believed the house had architectural integrity, a good social <br />history, and she believed, although the exposed siding was aluminum, it did have <br />the same design as the original. <br />Poppitz stated this was a great example of preservation. <br />Williams stated he was concerned about the siding, but believed the house <br />retained architectural integrity. He also stated the social history was important. <br />Muckle stated the applicant had done a great job with the renovations and she <br />believed the social history was excellent. She stated she would like the applicant <br />to further research preserving the windows. <br />Lewis made a motion to approve the application based on architectural and <br />social significance. Williams seconded the motion. Stewart added a friendly <br />amendment to state the application excludes the garage, outhouse and recent <br />additions. The motion carried 6 – 0. <br />Public Hearing – Landmark Application – 557 Jefferson <br /> <br />Koertje opened public hearing. <br />Staff presented staff report and PowerPoint presentation. Staff closed by <br />recommending approval of case because the structure had architectural and <br />social significance. <br />Muckle asked staff if there was another house on this location prior to <br />construction of this home. <br />Staff stated there was no evidence to state there had been a previous structure <br />on this site. <br />Koertje asked why Fabrizio was chosen as the name. <br />Staff answered the house had been associated with the developers, Fabirzio, <br />who had a history of development in Louisville. <br />Ann Marie Spear, applicant, presented her case and asked the Commission if <br />they had any questions. She stated the following regarding the structures <br />integrity: <br /> <br /> The structure is entirely original – no additions. <br /> <br /> Windows and doors are in original and are in their original location. <br /> <br /> The only modification to the exterior is the placement of a solar panel on <br />the north side of the roof. <br /> <br />