Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 21, 2010 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Muckle asked if Spears knew anything more about the contractors. <br />Spears said no but added they were very good and very detailed. <br />Koertje mentioned the application stated she would like to designate the structure <br />and the property. He asked the applicant why she wanted to designate the <br />property. <br />Spears answered she wanted to protect the property so that no one could build <br />anything else on it. <br />Poppitz stated this was a nice example of a 1950’s bungalow. <br />Lewis asked Spears what she thought of the name. <br />Spears stated she was fine with the name. <br />Public Comments – none heard <br />Koertje closed the public hearing <br />Commission Questions and Comments <br />Lewis stated her excitement about preserving a 1950’s bungalow and said the <br />house was in really good condition. <br />Koertje agreed and stated it is nice to have this era represented. <br />Stewart stated it was a great era and the quality of construction was very good. <br />Lewis stated she didn’t want to landmark the property. <br />Stewart agreed, but stated maybe she could pursue a conservation easement. <br />Koertje stated he did not believe there was enough information to landmark the <br />property. <br />Spears stated she was fine with only landmarking the structure. <br />Lewis made a motion to approve the application based on architectural <br />significance, it represents style and period of mid century architecture. Stewart <br />seconded the motion. Koertje asked if there was any discussion regarding the <br />name of the structure. Lewis suggested to keep the name as is. The motion <br />carried 6 – 0. <br />Update/Discussion/Action – 701 Main Street <br /> <br /> <br />