Laserfiche WebLink
Staff finds that the new retaining wall and orientation of the rear -abutting lot at 360 Troon <br />Court creates a condition where the property receives more shade than other similar <br />properties, limiting the ability to develop the lot and yard spaces in a way that promotes the <br />convenience, prosperity, and welfare of the residents without seeking a variance. The <br />proposal for development of the lot is also reasonable and customary in size with other <br />homes being rebuilt in the neighborhood. Reducing the size of the home would limit <br />reasonable development of the lot that other homes would with the same zoning in this <br />neighborhood would enjoy. Staff finds the proposal meets this criterion. <br />4. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the applicant. <br />The subdivision and Planned Unit Development resulted in lots along Troon Court that were <br />approximately 20ft above the grade of the lot at 953 St Andrews Ln, requiring retaining walls. <br />The applicants did not create this conditions that necessitated a retaining wall. Staff finds <br />the proposal meets this criterion. <br />5. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood <br />or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the <br />appropriate use or development of adjacent property. <br />Staff finds that the proposal would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. <br />The house is similar in size to other homes under construction in Coal Creek Ranch Filing <br />3. Many nearby rebuilds have covered porches that are comparable in size to the <br />proposed covered porch encroachment. There are support letters from nearby properties <br />as well, including the immediately effected neighbor at 951 St Andrews Lane (see <br />attachment 6). Staff finds the proposal meets this criterion. <br />6. That the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford relief and is <br />the least modification possible of the provisions of Title 17 of the Louisville <br />Municipal Code that is in question. <br />The orientation of the structure allows for the least encroachment necessary into the front <br />yard setback, while still addressing the impacts and constraints of the retaining wall and <br />facilitating construction of a customary home consistent with other homes in the <br />neighborhood. The structure otherwise conforms to side and rear setbacks, as well as height <br />requirements. Staff finds the proposal meets this criterion. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br />Comments received to date are included as Attachment 5. Several additional letters of <br />support were received that were not included in the materials for the October 18, 2023 <br />hearing. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff finds the proposal meets the applicable variance criteria in Section 17.48.110 of the <br />LMC, and therefore, recommend approval of the variance request. <br />953 St Andrews Ln - Variance Page 8 of 8 <br />BOA — JANUARY 24, 2024 <br />