My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2024 01 09 - SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2024 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2024 01 09 - SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 2:36:35 PM
Creation date
1/25/2024 12:30:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/9/2024
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9E1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
You may be thinking "why is he worried about this since it is a low priority?" I ask you — why are <br />you putting things in your Work Plan that are low priorities? Let me tell you why it is in your <br />Work Plan. There has been a cabal of people who have been pushing for this closure and they <br />have been told "we cannot take it up if it is not in our Work Plan." <br />Now it is in your Work Plan, despite your having no idea how much money and staff time it <br />would take to do the analysis needed to make decisions, one way or the other, on the project. <br />This is a complex multifaceted issue that needs much more thought than just tossing into your <br />work plan for purposes of making it possible. <br />The plan says it would take two or three council meetings. That is purely a guess. Furthermore, <br />leaving the time of the time of the year the project unknow is being deceptive towards the <br />public. <br />Please take it out. <br />Thank you for time and service. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.