My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2002 01 22
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2002 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2002 01 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:22:41 AM
Creation date
9/15/2010 9:36:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2002 01 22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />CITY OF LOUISVILLE <br /> <br />January 22, 2002 City Council Study Session <br /> <br />The City Council of the City of Louisville met in a study session at 7:00 p.m. in the meeting room of <br />the Louisville Public Library, 950 Spruce Street, Louisville, Colorado. The following persons were <br />present - <br /> <br />City Council: Mayor Tom Davidson, Mayor Pro-tem Chuck Sisk, <br />Arnold Levihn, and John Keany <br /> <br />Staff Present: Bill Simmons, City Manager <br />Heather Balser, Assistant to the City Manager <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director <br />Ken Johnstone, Principal Planner <br />Jeffrey Martell, Planner II <br />Belinda Goebel, Administrative Assistant <br /> <br /> <br />Proposed changes to the telecommunications portion of the Zoning Code were discussed. The <br />proposed changes: <br /> <br /> <br />clarify the height restrictions for CMRS facilities in all zoning districts where it was <br />otherwise not well defined; and <br /> <br /> <br />change the definition for a Freestanding CMRS facility and redefine the definition of an <br />Alternative Tower Structure. Currently, freestanding facilities are not allowed, and <br />alternative tower structures are allowed by SRU, if camouflaged with the surrounding <br />setting. <br /> <br />The Planning Department staff sent out the proposed changes to seven telecommunications industry <br />representatives and asked for their comments. No comments were received. <br /> <br />There was discussion regarding ‘compatible’ versus ‘natural’ settings & surrounding structures. The <br />Planning staff stated that several communities require the applicant to submit three site suggestions <br />with their application. The suggestions would include one location that the applicant feels would <br />work and two locations that the applicant feels would not work, along with explanations for their <br />suggested locations. <br /> <br />Council suggested that the ordinance should clearly state that if the CMRS is building-mounted and <br />does not exceed the height of the building parapet, it could be approved administratively. It was also <br /> <br /> 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.