My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2002 08 13
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2002 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2002 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:22:42 AM
Creation date
9/15/2010 9:43:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2002 08 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
track resurfacing, as well as the HVAC system and lighting at the Library as examples. He suggested <br />increasing the fees at the Recreation Center to raise money for renovations. <br /> <br />Council questioned the priority level of the City Hall renovations, specifically why it was rated as a <br />priority (1) when the Community Park was rated as a priority (2). There was discussion that the <br />space being vacated by the Police Department will not be functional, and that it will require some <br />funding to make the space useable. Council requested a list of City Hall safety, ADA, and customer <br />service issues. In further discussions, Council requested a map of proposed trail improvements and <br />questioned whether trail improvements could be included in the Open Space Master Plan. <br /> <br />Judge Bruce Joss expressed his concerns to Council regarding the Municipal Court remaining at City <br />Hall when the Police Department is relocated. He cited the audio system and court security as his <br />main areas of concern. He explained that Louisville Municipal Court is a Court of Record and the <br />current audio system is not very functional in that respect. He stated that when the Police <br />Department relocates, the Municipal Court would not have the ability to readily call for a backup <br />officer, when necessary. He explained that many individuals with outstanding warrants in Louisville <br />also have outstanding warrants with other jurisdictions. He described the process for escorting <br />no <br />prisoners through the building, past employees and the public, and stated that there is emergency <br />access and/or exit for staff in the current situation. In addition, when the Municipal Court conducts a <br />jury trial, it is necessary for staff to use lobbies, offices, and other conference areas to accommodate <br />the trial. <br /> <br />Nancy Varra, City Clerk and Municipal Court Administrator, agreed with Judge Joss and expressed <br />concern for everyone’s safety. <br /> <br />Council agreed to include the total cost for a Municipal Court in the new Police Department <br />building. <br /> <br />Discussion turned to the Community Park, with the Mayor suggesting that the City use the $500,000 <br />reserved for the park to begin designing & building a park. Council members agreed that other <br />amenities could be phased in over time. <br /> <br />Tom Mayer requested that the Via Appia underpass be placed out for bids. Michele Van Pelt agreed, <br />stating that if voters at the November election approve the bond issue, the need for an underpass at <br />Via Appia would increase. <br /> <br />The Mayor suggested that Council reclassify the priority (2) list into priority (2) and (3). He <br />explained that if a new major retailer locates in the former KMart building, increased sales tax <br />revenues from this retailer could be used to fund the priority (2) list. In addition, the Mayor <br />suggested using the same criteria to prioritize the priority (1) list. Council agreed. <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.