Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 09 16

Home Browse Search

Lipton inquired about ownership and if the project would become a condominium ownership. Chesnut stated he is the owner and it would not "condominiumize ". Pritchard asked if the site would be available 24/7. Chesnut stated it would be not be available 24/7. There will be regular business hours. A 24/7 schedule would require a residence on site. Pritchard asked if adjacent land owners were given a chance to review the plan. McMillan stated the project was reviewed through the st. • d referral process which included those area owners. Brauneis asked for clarification of the floodplain. McMillan stated the owner has a floodplain pe for the sit Brauneis discussed with the applicant the . ®® onal parking sp continued with a discussion of the dete < •ond are Callahan confirmed the size of the detention ®.nd 4 is adequate, t e drainage is detoured for water quality and not storm w. - - plan will guide the release to Coal Creek so as not to mag - flow. Brauneis requested a clarification McMillan stated the Pub there was rational ne Sheets asked th except #6. Chesnut stated the Works a for th Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 19, 2010 Page 7 of 17 hts did not believe de o i ° ewer line. agreement with all the conditions Russel wh. -ir objection is to the north sign. Mc stated th- • th s adjacent to the ball fields and the Harney Last • Open Space. caus- • its location, not being adjacent to a street, the propos- ®° • n acts mo ke a billboard. Members None heard. Staff and Applica Tmmary and Recommendation: No additional summary or comments heard. Public Hearing Closed Commission Comments: Russell stated the project is great and he appreciated the discussion about the signage. O'Connell stated her approval of the project and she would also support the three requested signs.