My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 09 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 09 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:30:11 AM
Creation date
9/29/2010 1:36:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 09 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
which will demonstrate that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor <br />for the structure will be elevated two feet above existing grade and will <br />otherwise comply with the floodplain development permit. <br />5. All references to a wall sign located on the northern side of the facility will <br />be removed from the plans. <br />6. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant will obtain <br />written permission to cross the property subject to the utility easements on <br />the north side of the property with a private sanitary sewer line from all <br />parties who have an interest in the property under th utility easements. <br />7. The applicant will address, to the satisfaction of th <br />Department and prior to commencement of any <br />concerns set forth in the Public Works memo <br />2010. <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />None heard at this time. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Kyle Callahan, representing Doug Chesnu • us , • e following: <br />• There is a need for additional storage i® • ille. <br />• A permitted use in an In zone dist .Ithough storage is not a <br />typical industrial use beca q . is pro <br />• The storage will be for resi <br />Commission Que <br />Russell requested t <br />imports <br />Che <br />wo <br />Lipton! <br />Chesnut st <br />Lipton asked a <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 19, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 17 <br />blic Works <br />lopment, all drainage <br />dated August 4, <br />Callahan continued wi cussio Y • C• • i• s as originally proposed) <br />and #6. He continu -• • s : ® they : • -ased st- has proposed to remove <br />Condition #2. He ®reaues • the re • al of Condition #6. <br />signs they consider to be the most <br />orth would be their choice while the south sign <br />ng the property. <br />is not planned as the walls will fully contain the site. <br />g on site, external and internal. <br />Chesnut demonstr: -d by use of the site plan where the external site lighting is <br />planned. He stated the internal lighting will be 10' or lower. <br />Lipton asked staff if they had reviewed the lighting plan. <br />McMillan stated it had been reviewed by staff. <br />Lipton asked is there would be outdoor storage. <br />Chesnut stated there would not be outdoor storage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.