My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2010 10 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2010 10 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:34:11 PM
Creation date
10/18/2010 3:24:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
FCPKT 2010 10 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: MALCOLM FLEMING, CITY MANAGER <br />DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2010 <br />SUBJECT: EXPANDING SALES TAX AUDITS TO LARGE RETAILERS AND <br />UTILITIES – DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY <br />ORIGINATING <br />DEPARTMENT: FINANCE <br />SUMMARY: <br />The Finance Department performs sales tax audits on small to medium-size retailers. The <br />Finance Department does not currently audit large “big box” retailers or utilities. In the past, the <br />Finance Committee has discussed implementing audits of large retailers on a contractual, <br />contingency fee basis, but has not given formal authorization to proceed. <br />Finance staff has been in contact with the sales tax audit staff for the City of Lone Tree. Lone <br />Tree recently audited one of their large retailers by outsourcing the audit work on a contingency <br />fee basis. Based upon results of this audit, they have decided to continue these large audits, <br />but begin performing them with in-house staff. Lone Tree staff found that large retailers <br />consider audits a part of doing business and have large audit teams to handle them as <br />efficiently as possible. We also discussed designs of contingency fee contracts and <br />requirements for retailers to pay for any required travel costs. <br />Staff proposes to renew discussions with the Finance Committee pertaining to sales tax audits <br />of large retailers. Staff would also like to broaden the discussion to the possibility of auditing <br />utilities and combining sales tax audits with franchise fee audits. <br />If the Finance Committee gives authorization to proceed, the Finance Department will: <br /> Assess the pros and cons of auditing large retailers on a contractual, contingency fee <br />basis versus using in-house staff. A recommendation, and a request for proposals <br />document, if appropriate, would be brought to the Committee for final consideration. <br /> Begin researching the costs, benefits, and processes for auditing utilities and possibly <br />combining franchise fee audits with sales tax audits. Results of this research would be <br />brought back to the Finance Committee for discussion. <br /> Draft an ordinance requiring audited retailers to reimburse the City for any required <br />travel. This will incentivize retailers to provide information in digital format and reduce <br />the City’s overall audit costs. <br />SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM <br />Expanding Sales Tax Audits to Large <br />Retailers and Utilities <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.