My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 08 16 APPROVED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 08 16 APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:24 PM
Creation date
11/5/2010 10:42:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2010 08 16 APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 16, 2010 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br /> <br />There was later discussion regarding the dedicated HPC employee. Several <br />members of the Commission expressed their interest in having these discussions <br />brought forward to the City Manager. <br />Update/Discussion/Action – Possible Commercial Incentives <br />McCartney presented the memo included in the packet. <br />Popptiz questioned the actual amounts of the Business Assistance Program <br />(BAP). <br />McCartney stated he was not familiar enough with the BAP’s to give any more <br />information than what was shown on the handout. The Commission had asked <br />for the BAP information to be included as an example of the types of assistance <br />the City of Louisville offers commercial business owners. <br />Poppitz has heard from several business owners there is not enough money out <br />there to incentivize additional commercial development. <br />Tofte asked if the BAP information was public information. <br />McCartney answered in the affirmative as BAP’s are approved by resolution <br />before City Council. <br />Stewart asked if there could be addresses included on the BAP’s. <br />Poppitz stated he would continue his discussions with developers regarding this <br />issue and have more information at the next meeting. <br />Leary offered to draft a proposal that could be brought forward to City Council <br />recommending more incentives for downtown businesses. <br />Poppitz asked if the Commission was primarily interested in commercial buildings <br />50 years or older. <br />Koertje stated no – it should include buildings of character as well. <br />Committee Reports - none <br />Update on Demolition Requests <br />McCartney stated there were two demolition requests requested for review by the <br />subcommittees and there was one more demolition review to meet regarding <br />2245 East Street. <br /> <br />Items from Commission Members <br />Lewis stated there is still a typo in the Old Town Overlay Handout which needs to be <br />modified. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.