My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 10 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2010 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 10 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:05:02 PM
Creation date
11/10/2010 10:35:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/19/2010
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C3
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2010 10 19
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 5, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br />Nowhere else in the City are off - premises signs permitted, therefore the prohibition is <br />meant as a citywide equity treatment. Staff wanted to stay consistent for the entire city <br />so no one business has an advantage over the other. <br />Councilor Sackett commented the downtown sign code has been discussed by the <br />BRaD Committee and received their support. <br />Councilor Dalton inquired about the process of a request for a mural larger than what is <br />allowed. Planning Director Russ explained a non - conforming mural request would be <br />reviewed by the Planning Staff, Planning Commission and requires City Council's <br />approval. At this time no criteria has been created and Staff would work with the City <br />Attorney to create new criteria for murals. <br />City Attorney Light explained murals do not fit into the categories of special exception or <br />the modification of a PUD as they are designed to deal with site plan issues. He agreed <br />a mural is not advertising. There is a distinction between commercial speech, which is <br />regulated by signage and the non - commercial, which can include a mural subject to <br />certain limitations. The distinction is based on content. The revision gives a use by right <br />based on non - content criteria, without creating a moving timeline. <br />Planning Director Russ clarified civic based events such as the Farmer's Market allow <br />off - premises signs. <br />Mayor Sisk requested public comments and hearing none, closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION: Councilor Muckle moved to approve Ordinance No. 1580, Series 2010 with <br />the modification to add the word "historic" to the vision statement. Councilor Dalton <br />seconded the motion. Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 6 -0. <br />Absent: Councilor Clabots. <br />PRESENTATION — CITY MANAGER'S PROPOSED 2011 BUDGET AND <br />2011 -2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN — SET PUBLIC HEARING TUESDAY, <br />OCTOBER 19, 2010 <br />Mayor Sisk requested a Staff presentation. <br />City Manager Fleming presented the 2011 Proposed Budget for all funds both by <br />programs and by individual funds. He also presented the 2011 capital projects included <br />in the 2011 — 2015 Capital Improvements Plan. He outlined the guiding principles to <br />balance the budget and reviewed the 2009 Budget focus areas, which included <br />eliminating positions, not filling some vacancies and reducing hours; reducing <br />compensation, benefits and training; significant service reductions and increasing fees <br />and charges. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.