Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: MALCOLM FLEMING, CITY MANAGER <br />DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2010 <br />SUBJECT: UTILITY BILLING ISSUES <br />ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: FINANCE <br />SUMMARY: <br />The Finance Department would like to bring two Utility Billing Issues to the attention of the <br />Mayor and City Council. First, the Finance Department has discovered a number of utility <br />water billing accounts that are not billing using the correct rate table, resulting in a number of <br />accounts being overbilled. The Finance department is issuing credits when possible, but for <br />some accounts the credit owed is large enough that the Finance Department staff believes we <br />should issue checks. The total amount of billing credits to be issued is $20,540. The total <br />amount of checks to be issued is $55,969. A detailed discussion of this issue follows below in <br />the section entitled "Correction of Service Size billing error ". <br />Second, the Finance Department is in the process of reviewing all old, outstanding utility <br />receivables in order to make a recommendation as to their appropriate treatment and <br />disposition. This is being done in conjunction with a review of the City's "red tag" policy and <br />procedures. A detailed discussion of this issue follows below in the section entitled "Review of <br />Utility Accounts and Red Tag Procedures ". <br />Correction of Service Size billing error: <br />By ordinance, monthly water billing is calculated using rate tables that vary by tap size (aka <br />service size). As a part of the radio read meter replacement program, the Public Works <br />Operations Department compiled a spreadsheet of all meters installed throughout the city. In <br />performing some routine account analysis, we compared the service /tap size in the billing <br />system to the meter size on this spreadsheet and discovered that 25 of the approximately <br />6,600 accounts (or .4 %) have a tap /service size that is less than the meter size. <br />This error can result in either under or over billing depending upon consumption levels. Prior to <br />2003, water billing tables were based on consumption levels only, not tap /service size, so the <br />maximum period of overbilling was January 2003 through October 2010. Of the 25 accounts, <br />19 resulted in overbilling and should receive a credit adjustment and 6 resulted in under billing <br />and will be corrected prospectively. We looked at the magnitude of the credit as well as the <br />historical consumption patterns of the 19 accounts to determine which accounts should <br />IL S SUBJECT UTILITY BILLING ISSUES <br />AGENDA ITEM <br />