My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2024 03 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2024 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2024 03 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:42:25 PM
Creation date
3/27/2024 11:26:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
3/20/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Building Code Board of Appeals <br />Minutes <br />5.18.23 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />new building codes, however, some new portions of the code are limiting the <br />availability of supply due to the technology in the code being further ahead than <br />the products needed to support the code. <br />Berry read the question again posed by the City Council as to what changes the <br />BCBOA would suggest to Council. The recommendation from the BCBOA is that <br />if technical legislation is being considered then Council must consider advice <br />from the technical board, i.e., the BCBOA. Berry further explained that if there is <br />legislation that is being recommended by an entity that supports green building, <br />then there should also be a counterpoint provided by the BCBOA. <br />Geise commented that Chad Root had referenced, for the 2021 IECC residential <br />code adoption that there were fourth -graders who called in to the City Council <br />meeting when that was being discussed to sway the Council to pass the <br />legislation. However, the BCBOA board, comprised of professionals in the <br />building industry were not invited to discuss and comment on the decision. <br />Berry added that the board needs to know in advance of when building code <br />legislation is going to be discussed that they can be proactive to get their <br />opinions heard. Berry further added that the board is not political and their views <br />are based on fact. For the 2021 IECC Residential code decision the board was <br />not consulted until months after discussions had already started with City Council <br />and the contulation firm. When any code adoption is being studied is the time <br />when the BCBOA board should be consulted for input. <br />Berry and the board agreed that the final decision on the IECC energy code had <br />already been decided by the time that the BCBOA board was consulted and it <br />was a waste of time for the board to meet and discuss it. <br />Berry this is a technical board and they look at the facts and the council is doing <br />a disservice to the constituents if they do not use a technical board when <br />considering legislation that is entirely technical. Further, the board needs to do a <br />better job of presenting their opinion based on the facts and experience with <br />particular code items. <br />Berry commented that the board has been effective in providing advice to the <br />building department, but ineffective in providing advice to City Council. <br />Berry read the last item to discuss regarding that City Council has an informal <br />policy of managing meeting time and canceling or reducing meeting times when agendas <br />are light. What are the practices of your board in regards to <br />agenda development, meeting duration, and meeting tempo? Berry answered that this <br />board only meets as needed. <br />DI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.