My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 06 26
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2024 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 06 26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2024 10:20:53 AM
Creation date
6/26/2024 3:00:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/26/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />May 22, 2024 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />underpass at front street. Due to railway discussions, the implementation was delayed. <br />Approvals have been received but the LRC would need to discuss as the budget item was not <br />carried forward for this project. <br />Commissioner Harald asked who is responsible for building and maintaining the trails in <br />Lafayette. The Director of Community development highlighted the trail system. The Director of <br />Public Works commented that if the underpass is approved, the trail system related to this <br />project will be completed. The portion through the Lafayette sports complex will depend on <br />Lafayette completing their plan of that space. <br />Chair Adler asked for more information on where the rail would be located, and the likelihood of <br />the project being completed. There was a discussion around commuter rail and FRCC <br />passenger rail. <br />Commissioner Iglesias asked if there has to be an underpass to provide parking. It was noted <br />that if parking areas were installed at this time, there is no good crossing point. There was a <br />discussion around the Highway 42 improvements, the lack of and need for a safe crossing, <br />possible impacts from commuter rail, connectivity via trail systems in the city and surrounding <br />areas, and the increase of pedestrian traffic at the last two installed underpasses at Kestrel and <br />Davidson Mesa. <br />Commissioner Iglesias asked if there are plans for other things on the east side of Highway 42. <br />It was noted that, other than the expansion of sports complex, there is a lot of existing <br />development with "latent demand" that will likely be seen with the improvement. It will encourage <br />more people to use it as a safe place to come to Louisville. <br />Commissioner Tofte commented that the hawk signal is on a city street, whereas this is a state <br />highway, which is a totally different situation for a hawk signal. He noted that with the increased <br />speed limits on Highway 42, it will be much less safe to cross. <br />The Director of Public Works noted that the east side of Highway 42 is the core problem we're <br />trying to solve with the Highway 42 improvements for multi -modal north- and south -bound traffic. <br />Commissioner Lipton asked who is funding the Highway 42 project. The state is funding 60% of <br />the Highway 42 corridor and DRCOG will fund a portion of the proposed underpass. <br />Commissioner Lipton wants to know who is funding the rest of this project and why is Louisville <br />being asked to fund a component of this project when the bulk of the project is non -Louisville <br />regional/state high volume road. With other big state projects, are they funding underpasses <br />under other projects like the diagonal project or are they asking municipalities to fund these <br />types of projects. Commissioner Lipton doesn't think it's the LRC's role to weigh in whether we <br />need an underpass here or not. He feels this is for other members of the local, state and county <br />government to determine. He noted that, from the LRC view, the issue is whether the LRC <br />wants to fund an underpass, contingent upon a broader analysis of what the LRC goals are. <br />Commissioner Lipton commented that he feels he doesn't have the information to focus on a <br />single large project without knowing the scope of other LRC projects. He noted that it would be <br />difficult for him to make a decision today on funding this project. He also asked about parking on <br />the other side of Highway 42, specifically, what capital plan is that included in, and will it come to <br />the LRC for additional funding? He also asked that, if the role of the LRC is to eliminate blight in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.