My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 06 26
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2024 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 06 26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2024 10:20:53 AM
Creation date
6/26/2024 3:00:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/26/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />May 22, 2024 <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />DBA President and Louisville Resident Rick Kron supports bonding and does not support the <br />underpass project. He provided details on why he does not support the underpass project. <br />Louisville Resident Graham Smith commented that the LRC's prior support to underpasses was <br />a wholistic view to improve access all around the city and he feels this is no longer relevant. He <br />feels that this discussion is about prioritization of projects. He doesn't support the underpass <br />project and does support the Downtown Vision Plan. He also commented that rail has been <br />discussed for over a decade and it shouldn't be part of the conversation with regards to the <br />underpass project. <br />Louisville Resident Susan McEachern, a member of Louisville Open Space Advocates, <br />expressed concern about impacting open space on the east side of Highway 42 with possible <br />parking for the underpass project. <br />Mike Kranzdorf, a downtown property owner, not a resident, is very surprised to hear there is a <br />preferred Downtown Vision Plan and a number and seems that this has turned into a staff <br />project, as has the underpass project. He expressed concern that the Downtown Vision Plan be <br />phased so that it doesn't close businesses during construction. The Economic Vitality Manager <br />commented that the preferred Vision Plan has not been adopted yet; public comment has been <br />received and throughout the engagement process preferences have been narrowed down for <br />LRC consideration. <br />Reports of Commission: <br />Staff Updates <br />The Economic Vitality Manager noted that the staff updates were provided in the meeting packet <br />and asked the Commission if they had any questions. Feel free to reach out to the EV Manager <br />with any questions. <br />Commissioner Comments: No comments on staff updates from the commission. <br />Downtown Business Association Updates <br />None. <br />Chamber of Commerce Updates: <br />None. <br />Discussion Items for Future Meetings: <br />South Street Underpass Sculpture <br />2. Ironton Distillery Project Overview and Financial Ask <br />3. Executive Session for Property Acquisition <br />4. Fagade Improvement Program Applications <br />Commissioner Closing Comments: none <br />Adjourn: The meeting adjourned at 9:59 a.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.