My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2023 10 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2023 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2023 10 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2024 9:53:22 AM
Creation date
6/26/2024 3:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/20/2023
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 2, 2023 <br />Page 5 of 14 <br />Councilmember Dickinson stated he is concerned we would be doing a lot of work but <br />wouldn't see a huge change as our neighbors are not doing this, He thinks that without <br />residential enforcement we won't see a big difference. He would like to include <br />incentives to get people to change out their lights sooner than later. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he is concerned about the cost to businesses to implement. <br />He would like to see more incentives to help people do this. Brackett Hogstad stated <br />staff plans to create an incentive/rebate program once they know what the regulations <br />will be. <br />Councilmember Leh asked what the cost of enforcement would be. Brackett Hogstad <br />stated that as written it could be done by existing staff. A full education program will be <br />created if the ordinance is approved. <br />Public Comments — None. <br />Councilmember Most stated she likes some things in the ordinance but it may make any <br />real differences and if that is the case it may not be worth requiring people to do it. <br />Councilmember Hoefner stated we might consider phasing this in with design guidelines <br />before we impose standards. We might like more time to see what the impacts and <br />costs are before we implement it. <br />Councilmember Hamlington noted that there are benefits even if we don't meet 100% <br />dark sky lighting goals. She would like to see movement towards a goal, progress is <br />important. The delta between new lighting with or without dark skies is not known. She <br />stated she likes the ordinance and it makes good progress which is better than doing <br />nothing at this point. <br />Mayor Maloney stated that the estimate that a quarter of homes already meet this goal <br />is due to a previous City program. He stated his concern is the cost impacts to <br />businesses. He stated this may be a time to take action on principal even knowing <br />surrounding communities may not join in. He supports the ordinance as written. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Fahey stated she also supports it as written. There are many things this <br />will help with and it is a good first step. Incentives can be the next step. <br />Councilmember Hoefner asked for this to go into effect with a slightly longer time frame <br />to get people in process a chance to come into compliance. <br />Councilmember Dickinson clarified this does not affect current buildings that are not <br />taking actions that triggers these rules. He stated he doesn't see a major negative <br />impact to the community but it also doesn't have a huge positive impact either. He <br />stated he is willing to support it but is concerned the next steps on incentives and <br />addressing parking lighting will get done. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.