My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 1995 01 24
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
1994-1999 Planning Commission
>
1995 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 1995 01 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2024 4:19:30 PM
Creation date
7/30/2024 4:19:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Subdivision Name
Hunters Ridge
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission <br />From: Peter H. Kernkamp, Planner II <br />Subject: Old Town - Zoning Review - January 24, 1995 Meeting <br />Date: January 20, 1995 <br />The attached draft Old Town PUD development standards have been revised to reflect several <br />changes resulting from the discussion at the last Planning Commission meeting regarding Old Town <br />that was held October 25, 1994. Minutes from the October meeting have been included in your <br />packets to help refresh your memory. These changes include reductions in proposed accessory <br />structure setbacks, clarification of reduced front yard setbacks to conform to established setbacks on <br />the same street, adding a maximum front yard setback, and prohibiting garages facing the street where <br />alley access is available. These changes have been highlighted. The concept of bulk plane regulations <br />was also discussed at the October meeting. The staff is preparing a series of graphics to illustrate this <br />concept and how it may apply to Old Town. These will be presented at the meeting Tuesday night. <br />The suggestion has been made that the setbacks for accessory structures should be reduced to as <br />small as 0'. There are several potential problems with a setback standard of less than 3 feet. For <br />setbacks less than three feet, the building code requires more stringent requirements such as fire rated <br />wall construction and prohibition of openings such as windows, doors and vents. Also, there is a <br />potential maintenance problem with a zero setback because the owner of the accessory structure <br />would need to go onto the adjoining private property to paint or otherwise maintain the building. <br />Unless there is an easement for such purpose on the adjoining property, three feet is about the <br />minimum distance to reasonably allow access for maintenance. <br />The rear yard setback for accessory structures to a public alley presents some different issues. The <br />building code issues are not as critical because the building code considers the centerline of the alley <br />as the effective property line. A minimum three foot setback may still be desirable to avoid possible <br />encroachments into the alley, especially since the exact location of property lines is often uncertain <br />in many parts of Old Town. <br />There is a particular concern about garages that enter onto the alley. The platted width of alleys in <br />Old Town vary from 20 feet to as narrow as 10 feet. The actual pavement width is often a few feet <br />narrower than the platted width because the alleys typically also include poles for overhead utility <br />lines. This may severely limit the available maneuvering room for vehicles entering and exiting the <br />garage if the garage is located near the property line. A possible way to address setbacks for <br />accessory garages that enter onto the alley is to establish a minimum setback distance from the <br />opposite side of the alley right of way. If the standard were set at 24 feet, which corresponds to the <br />aisle width in commercial parking lot, the setback would be four feet from the property line on a 20 <br />foot wide alley, 8 feet from the property line on a 16 foot wide alley, etc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.