My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 12 13 APPROVED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 12 13 APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:24 PM
Creation date
2/2/2011 9:36:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2010 12 13 APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 13, 2010 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />Longo answered the field work will be done in approximately 3 weeks but the historical <br />research will take longer. <br />Lewis asked if Lingo was using the original survey forms done in 2000. <br />Lingo answered in the affirmative. <br />Muckle asked if a period of significance has been established. <br />Lingo answered it has not been determined. The default answer is 50 years ago, but <br />that won’t be the final time frame established. <br />Muckle asked if the information would be GIS compatible. <br />Lingo stated it would be GIS compatible. She has been working with Susan Dellinger, <br />City of Louisville GIS coordinator. <br />Stewart asked if Lingo has included the historic building rating system definitions from <br />page 51 of the Downtown Handbook. <br />Lingo answered in the affirmative. <br />Lewis asked if Lingo believed the state would use Bacon’s social history research. <br />Lingo answered they are very interested in the social history and would use the <br />information. <br />Stewart asked Lingo’s opinion on the benefits of being designated by the state as an <br />historic district. <br />Lingo answered tax credits are the greatest benefit. <br />Public Comments – <br />Janice Hoffman, 1131 Jefferson Avenue, asked what established the boundary for the <br />survey. <br />Lingo answered it was the boundary of Jefferson Place Subdivision. <br />Pre-filing Conference – 728 Grant Avenue – Rear Addition <br />McCartney reviewed the memo included in the packet. <br />Cameron Weise, applicant, presented his proposal for an addition. He was seeking <br />guidance in whether the addition could be done if he were to landmark his residence. <br />Poppitz stated the project appeared to be a prime example of a sensitive rear addition. <br />Weise asked what would happen if the rear windows were changed. <br />Lewis answered he might be able to slightly modify the windows in the rear and not lose <br />integrity. <br />McCartney spoke about having a roof pitch less than 6:12. <br />Koertje stated the HPC is in favor of providing design assistance for this project. <br />Lewis stated she would help the owner with design assistance. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.