My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 01 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2011 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 01 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
2/14/2011 9:45:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2011 01 13
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 18, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />Based on the alternative analysis staff is recommending the Potential Location <br />Option #3 as the appropriate location for the emergency siren tower structure. <br />Russ continued with a discussion of the Special Review Use criteria for the <br />revised site location. He concluded the discussion with a summary, stating all the <br />criteria had been met with the exception of #5 which is not applicable to this <br />project. <br />Russ stated staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 25, Series 2010 with <br />one condition: <br />1) The City shall relocate the existing North Emergency Siren approximately <br />180 -feet north, northeast of the existing site in the ical location <br />currently marked on the project site. <br />Russ introduced Mike Weber with Artek Electronics <br />specialist. <br />unication /sound <br />Weber stated sound is not an exact science • use of environmental factors. <br />Lipton asked how it travels down to the P <br />Weber stated sound does go downhill, but the soun <br />homes /buildings. He stated sound travels throng <br />Lipton clarified with <br />side effect would be <br />Weber stated he was correct. <br />uilding. <br />Lipton asked about locating the - at the Polic- uilding. <br />Questions of Staff. <br />All the Commissioners stated they had no questions of staff. <br />be blocked <br />air and over groun <br />to be extremely high in <br />'ding on the mesa. <br />Weber stated the only way it won' • or the t <br />the air (80' to 100') to provide cove ®e fo he people <br />Members of the Publi <br />Scott Reese, 795 ch ated a member of the board of directors for <br />the Mesa Villag- A. He th- red City nager Fleming and staff for their <br />working with the . He s • the HOA proves the alterative location which <br />is 180' north /norther •f t • • tall site location. <br />Shari W. Birch Ct asked if the height of the siren needed to be as <br />tall. <br />Weber stated the hei• s at the minimum recommended height to keep the <br />sound level below the dB. If the tower was lower than the sound would be <br />louder and out of comp) ce with the federal regulations. <br />; if the tower were less visual, lower in height, then the <br />re sound impact on the neighbors. <br />Scott Soelberg, 748 W. Birch Ct. stated his confusion with sound travel. He <br />asked Weber; if from the top of the mesa would sound drop down and weaken. <br />Weber stated yes, due to the additional structures and other environmental <br />factors. He stated if the town was placed at the Police Building the tower would <br />be much taller and the volume would be louder. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.