My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 02 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2011 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 02 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
2/17/2011 1:58:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2011 02 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Brauneis stated he would like to re -visit the issue in 18 months. <br />Lipton asked if there were any other technical questions of staff. <br />Russell asked if the review could be a special review use review and would <br />require significant modifications. <br />Russ stated the criteria is too subjective. <br />Additional Public Comment: <br />Menaker asked if the cultivation was discussed at a public meeting with City <br />Council. <br />Russ stated it had been discussed with City Council. <br />Menaker stated cultivation has never been suppor <br />Commission move forward with the direction to s <br />eastern CB area. <br />Additional Commission Questions and Discussion: <br />Russell asked if there is a rush to approve the ordin <br />Russ answered the moratorium expire in Mar <br />Russell asked if the moratorium could be extend <br />Russ stated he did not know about extendir <br />been directed to move forward with a 2 re <br />15, 2011. <br />Russell stated he • • • not u rstan <br />adding one (1) more dispensary. <br />Sheets stated she did not feel the need to <br />comforta the ordinance. <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13, 2011 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />uld like to see the <br />to try t• inate the <br />the m • +rium. Also, staff had <br />inances by February <br />the city is city concerned about <br />ove forward without feeling <br />Publi : ring d Commission Comments: <br />Sh- tated she . • not feel the Commission had analyzed everything, the <br />reas• • for the CB zone district is not compelling. At this point and time she is <br />willing • it the number of dispensaries to the two (2) existing locations. She <br />stated sh- not been convinced to approve what has been presented by staff. <br />Russ asked t• • -a •. Granted by Lipton. <br />Russ asked if the anyway staff can understand what more information the <br />Commission needs for approval. <br />Lipton stated the Commissioners should include that in their comments. <br />Brauneis stated there is enough information to pass this forward to City Council. <br />Pritchard stated he was in favor of passing it on to Council. He stated the <br />information provided has been based on direction from City Council to staff. <br />Lipton stated the staff had done a good job in deciphering City Council direction. <br />He stated he is not sure the Commission should move anything forward until the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.