Laserfiche WebLink
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />June 26, 2024 <br />Page 3of8 <br />Commissioner Lipton commented that since we are getting to where we want to prioritize <br />funding and looking at potential bonding and cash flow, he would like to focus on the high <br />priority items in the work plan to see if the LRC wants to do them all and how much it might cost. <br />He requested a cash flow analysis. <br />The EV Manager commented that there are quite a few programmatic items on the list that don't <br />have funding attached. She will separate these items out and indicate which items have funding <br />assigned. The Director of Community Development commented that there are three items that <br />keep coming up for funding, and asked the LRC to let staff know if these are still the items the <br />LRC is interested in funding. He noted that the current cash flow information provided includes <br />the Downtown Streetscape and South Street Underpass projects but not property acquisitions. <br />He asked the LRC if they wanted to bring project information listed and categorized for future <br />discussions. <br />Commissioner Lipton asked for a separate list of programmatic items that need funding. <br />Chair Adler commented on the background of a few specific items in the work plan to provide <br />context on things that have already been accomplished. <br />The EV Manager summarized Commissioner comments, noting that there seems to be an <br />interest in reviewing the work plan in depth including information identifying programmatic items <br />and items that have been assigned funding. <br />Commissioner Harald commented that there are a lot of TBD items on the plan, and he doesn't <br />think it's helpful to include them. He also commented that as the high -cost projects are <br />discussed he is uncertain how much capacity LRC has to fund additional projects. He would like <br />to focus on items with a timeframe and priority with funding identified. <br />Commissioner Lipton asked to see a use of funds pro forma through 2031/2032 with an ending <br />balance by year. <br />Commissioner Tofte agreed that the LRC should focus on fewer items and get financial data on <br />those items to help LRC focus their efforts. <br />The EV Manager will bring this back to the LRC to be reviewed at the August meeting. She <br />noted that there are several resolutions that will be presented for approval in the July meeting. <br />Commissioner Lipton asked to get exposure to information on projects in July but not with a <br />request for decisions. He commented that he doesn't know why LRC is being pushed to make <br />decisions in this timeline. <br />The EV Manager noted that any possible TIF increases are not factored into current estimates. <br />Public Comments: None. <br />Bond Issuance Vote <br />The Economic Vitality Manager presented the Bond Issuance proposal for a vote of the <br />Commission. She provided the LRC with information on current programming, bonding, bonding <br />fiscal impact, the bonding process and timeline, as well as the time sensitive approval needed <br />