Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 24, 2024 <br />Page 2of8 <br />Improvement Plan. The City Manager Recommended CIP Plan Summary and the project request forms <br />were included in the packet. <br />Committee Comments: <br />Councilmember Hoefner suggested that the Via Appia pedestrian improvements might be a good place to <br />start the discussion, noting that Via Appia has been identified as a primary corridor for the community. He <br />requested an overview of what the proposed Via Appia improvements are and if we removed them from <br />the budget what the impact is and when the city may be able to complete the project. The Director of <br />Public Works responded that it was to supplement the paving program for the corridor. This concrete <br />would add directional crosswalks and relocate crosswalks, so they are at more of the main intersections <br />to create pedestrian refuges in the middle. It also included additional median work towards S. Boulder <br />Road, bump outs to shorten crosswalks. We moved this project out and we can revisit it in two years <br />because we can continue to observe the road, rescope the design to maybe bring the budget down, and <br />resubmit the project with safety improvements in two years. Councilmember Hoefner asked if doing it in <br />two years is more consistent with the notion of doing it as a pilot and evaluating when it's time to resurface <br />the road. The Director of Public works responded that about a year ago we were planning on striping it in <br />two years from then and we just re -striped it this year. It will depend on seasonal weather effects on how <br />long it can be pushed out; currently two years is a good timeframe to plan for. <br />Councilmember Kern commented that she hears from the community that improved safety is needed <br />sooner rather than later. She asked if, instead of waiting for two years for bigger changes that are possibly <br />going to occur on Via Appia, is it possible that those could be implemented sooner, and these funds would <br />allow for that. She asked if these funds aren't allocated in 2025 for this project, where would we find the <br />funds should we need to make enhancements in 2025. The Director of Public Works responded that if the <br />funds were not allocated in 2025, general fund balance transfer or re -prioritization of other projects would <br />need to be done. He noted that he would like to work through with City Council and the community to <br />define what people are envisioning. We understand there is a desire for additional safety, and we feel <br />there is a lot of safety out there, so we would want to have a good conversation to ensure we meet <br />expectations. Councilmember Kern asked the Director of Public Works if his suggestion is to spend the <br />next two years working on that and not putting anything towards making those improvements and not <br />have the money set aside in case maybe in the next six months of reviewing it you can come up with some <br />really good ideas. The Director of Public Works responded that he is open to either way, noting that he <br />thinks we have a safe road, and he understands that people want it to be safer. What is currently scoped <br />is maybe different from where we will end up and it's possible that the budget request may be different <br />depending on what Council and the community are looking for. Councilmember Hoefner commented on <br />$100K of design and engineering in 2025, asking if there is merit in keeping the design and engineering <br />portion in 2025 and revisiting the construction budget next year after careful consideration. The Director <br />of Public Works responded that there is merit in keeping that funding allocation for design and engineering. <br />Councilmember Fahey commented that she has heard from a lot of residents who were initially opposed <br />to the restriping of Via Appia and are now noticing that people are driving slower feel safer in their cars <br />and on their bicycles. She asked if we could maintain what we have while ensuring two lanes in both <br />directions for evacuations. The Director of Public Works responded that we would keep two lanes in both <br />directions, adding that some of the budgeted improvements included bump outs but after discussions with <br />11/87 <br />