Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 24, 2024 <br />Page 3of8 <br />the community we aren't going to pursue those because they would reduce capacity. He does have a plan <br />to have a community meeting to add signage and markings to identify an evacuation lane. There are still <br />some outstanding items around that topic. Councilmember Hamlington commented that she feels she <br />continues to hear concerns about pedestrian safety as it relates to Via Appia and the crossings. She has <br />concerns about completely removing this line item from the budget and she understands that staff need <br />to do further evaluation and scoping. She commented that she is open to the suggestion to, at minimum, <br />keeping the funding in the budget for the study, though she does have concerns about completely <br />removing the funds in order to take action from that study. She would like to consider an amount that <br />could remain in the budget to improve pedestrian safety. The Committee asked staff to come back with a <br />suggestion on how to keep this item in the budget at a lower amount to include the design and engineering <br />work as well as some funding to provide some implementation in 2025. The community needs to feel <br />engagement on this topic and have their concerns taking into account, which can proceed with a <br />community meeting. Then the design and engineering work in 2025 needed based on community input, <br />with funding for some improvements in 2025. The Director of Public Works suggested that we could start <br />with $500,000 for the 2025 budget. <br />Councilmember Hoefner commented on the Future 42 project, noting that he would like a high-level <br />understanding of what is included, contingent, grant funded, and has anything been pulled out that <br />shouldn't have been. Kurt commented that it looks like Highway 42 is currently unfunded with the only <br />project included related to Highway 42 is the South Street underpass. We will continue to apply for grant <br />funding for different pieces of Highway 42 depending on what grants are available and what pieces of the <br />corridor match with available grants and if we get awarded, we will have to have future conversations <br />about what the matching requirements are for any received grants. Councilmember Kern commented that <br />she has a concern that when we kick the can there isn't funding when we need it and her concern with <br />having nothing in this project that this is something that has been worked on and she isn't sure what the <br />ideal timeline is for the project but if we don't put something to this when we go to make the next change <br />we will need so much money out of the budget it won't be attainable. She would like to see some funding <br />moving towards this and asked staff if there is something we are trying to do in the next two years. She <br />feels the underpass as a connecting piece needs to continue to be related to the Highway 42 corridor and <br />she needs to understand how to explain how the Highway 42 corridor isn't important enough to be in the <br />budget while the underpass is moving forward. The Director of Public Works responded that, as we look <br />through the budget, we can go through the challenges for many of these projects and the fact is that not <br />all these big ideas fit the budget we have available. We have a vision for South Street that makes it a good <br />project and functional for the future when we start talking about building out S. Boulder Road and Pine <br />Street intersections and widening Highway 42 it's when our plan starts to diminish. The Interim City <br />Manager commented that this is also something we will be working on in the 2027 DRCOG and TIF cycle <br />grant funding. The Director of Public Works suggested that, given the committee's comments about <br />wanting to keep funding in the budget for Highway 42 improvements, maybe you would want to have <br />$500,000 - $1M in each year so that when you receive a grant it's already in your budget for grant matching <br />to give certainty on that project, but it does force staff to de -prioritize something else. It feels like a better <br />strategy is to wait for when we get a grant then we can de -prioritize and we're not holding money in limbo <br />in a tight budget. <br />12/87 <br />