My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 10 30
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2024 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 10 30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 12:34:48 PM
Creation date
10/29/2024 9:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/30/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />September 18, 2024 <br />Page5of8 <br />work. Once the consultant is on board and construction documents get to 30% design, the LRC <br />would review and determine which portions of Phase 1 you would like to fund. Chair Adler <br />commented that she wants to make sure that wayfinding doesn't get thrown out if we call out <br />Front Street as the LRC's priority. She feels there is so much more to learn. <br />Chair Adler asked how close we are to getting approval on the bond. The EV Manager <br />responded that there should be more information available in October and we hope to have the <br />bond issued by the end of the year. <br />Staff is hoping to have the RFP issued in Q4; we won't need funds until the consultant is <br />selected but we need to have funds in place prior to award of the design contract. We can't go <br />to council for approval of a project without funding in place. <br />Commissioner Harald commented that we will probably transition from the current design work <br />to more construction design work in 2025. He asked if we have any idea what that cost will be. <br />The City Engineer commented that design costs are typically about 10-15% of construction <br />costs. In this case, about $1.5M on a $15M project. Commissioner Lipton commented that <br />design would be phased. The City Engineer responded that we would award the contract for the <br />entire design, but as we go to 30% with a couple designs, get input and get to 60% with a more <br />refined design then to 100% construction documents. <br />Commissioner Harald asked for clarification, that the LRC would be adding a potential 1.5M <br />expense added to the 2025 budget. The City Engineer confirmed this is correct, adding that a <br />construction contract would also be needed in Q3/Q4 of 2025 to begin construction. <br />Commissioner Harald asked if this was going to be included in the budget discussion planned <br />for the next meeting. The EV Manager responded that the construction funding will come out of <br />the bond revenues. The LRC has an option to take the design work out of the bond revenues as <br />well and that will be part of the conversation in October. <br />Chair Adler asked if the funding for the design has to come out of the bond funding. The EV <br />Manager responded that she would have to research this question. In October a draft 2025 <br />budget will have the bond revenue included. The LRC has made a few monetary decisions this <br />year that weren't in the original 2024 budget, so staff will bring a 2024 budget amendment to the <br />LRC for review in October. <br />Commissioner Lipton commented that he wants to talk about Front Street, and he wants to <br />make sure that the commission makes good decisions. He asked to discuss the curbless street <br />design and whether it could be scaled better or if it's important enough to spend $4M. He asked <br />what variations are possible. He suggested the LRC look at this carefully today and give <br />direction to staff. <br />Commissioner Williams agreed with Commissioner Lipton and commented that for her the <br />emphasis should be on the plaza and investing in what that looks like will be key. Curbless <br />streets and raised intersections are nice from mobility and accessibility perspective but it is a <br />huge cost. Commissioner Williams asked staff if it is okay to discuss these details now. The <br />Director of Community Development commented that staff can take these notes and internalize <br />them so that when discussing the project with the design consultant after survey work, utilities <br />and drainage options are known staff can start to identify whether curbless streets are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.