My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
921 Main Historic Structure Assessment
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2024 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 12 16
>
Historic Structure Assessments
>
921 Main Historic Structure Assessment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2024 6:08:15 PM
Creation date
12/12/2024 2:22:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
12/16/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Property Address Number
921
Property Address Street Name
Main
Quality Check
12/12/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DAJDESIGN <br />ARCHITECTURE, INTERIORS <br />Condition Evaluation: <br />Our evaluation of the floor structure is limited as not all of the <br />structure was exposed for analysis. This includes the floor <br />sheathing, rim joists, and floor joist attachments. Our assessment <br />is for the portions of the floor framing that were visible. However, <br />it is likely that the non -visible areas are framed in a similar <br />manner and are in a similar condition as the areas that were <br />visible. It is also noted that the floor framing materials and <br />methods are typical of wood framed buildings constructed around <br />the same timeframe in the Louisville area. <br />vAThe 2x6 floor joists are in fair condition. The joist sizing and <br />` spacing do not meet minimum IBC code requirements for today's <br />standards, especially for office use whereas this building was <br />originally constructed and used as a house. However, the main <br />level floor felt sturdy and no significant areas of bulging or <br />sagging were observed. <br />The beams and columns that appear to have been added in 2023 <br />(although possibly in 1978 as building records are unclear) do not <br />meet minimum IBC code requirements for today's standards and <br />are therefore in poor condition. The column spacing exceeds the <br />minimum required for office use and the footing depths could not <br />be determined without further destructive investigation. <br />3-ply beam supported by steel columns. <br />The stacked CMU supports in the crawlspace were likely added to the midspan of the joists to support sagging <br />floors. However, these supports do not meet minimum code requirements and are not properly constructed or <br />supported and are therefore in poor condition. <br />The floor sheathing was not entirely visible for analysis as it is covered by finish floor layers on the main floor <br />and fiberglass batt insulation from beneath. Some areas of insulation have fallen or been removed exposing the <br />floor sheathing to a small extent. It is likely that the floor sheathing seen in these exposed areas is consistent <br />throughout. The visible floor sheathing is 1 x3 tongue -and -groove that would have been the original finish <br />flooring as is common for buildings built around the same timeframe in Louisville. This type of floor sheathing <br />does meet current code requirements and is in good condition. <br />The floor insulation is fiberglass batts within the floor joist bays that are primarily unfaced. The insulation <br />appears to have been added in 1978 with a presumed insulation value of R-19. The floor insulation is in fair <br />condition as there are some areas where the insulation has fallen or been removed and the insulation value is <br />below current code requirements for floors. <br />921 MAIN PAGE - 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.