Laserfiche WebLink
DAJDESIGN <br />ARCHITECTURE, INTERIORS <br />Condition Evaluation: <br />Our evaluation of the floor structure is limited as not all of the <br />structure was exposed for analysis. This includes the floor <br />sheathing, rim joists, and floor joist attachments. Our assessment <br />is for the portions of the floor framing that were visible. However, <br />it is likely that the non -visible areas are framed in a similar <br />manner and are in a similar condition as the areas that were <br />visible. It is also noted that the floor framing materials and <br />methods are typical of wood framed buildings constructed around <br />the same timeframe in the Louisville area. <br />vAThe 2x6 floor joists are in fair condition. The joist sizing and <br />` spacing do not meet minimum IBC code requirements for today's <br />standards, especially for office use whereas this building was <br />originally constructed and used as a house. However, the main <br />level floor felt sturdy and no significant areas of bulging or <br />sagging were observed. <br />The beams and columns that appear to have been added in 2023 <br />(although possibly in 1978 as building records are unclear) do not <br />meet minimum IBC code requirements for today's standards and <br />are therefore in poor condition. The column spacing exceeds the <br />minimum required for office use and the footing depths could not <br />be determined without further destructive investigation. <br />3-ply beam supported by steel columns. <br />The stacked CMU supports in the crawlspace were likely added to the midspan of the joists to support sagging <br />floors. However, these supports do not meet minimum code requirements and are not properly constructed or <br />supported and are therefore in poor condition. <br />The floor sheathing was not entirely visible for analysis as it is covered by finish floor layers on the main floor <br />and fiberglass batt insulation from beneath. Some areas of insulation have fallen or been removed exposing the <br />floor sheathing to a small extent. It is likely that the floor sheathing seen in these exposed areas is consistent <br />throughout. The visible floor sheathing is 1 x3 tongue -and -groove that would have been the original finish <br />flooring as is common for buildings built around the same timeframe in Louisville. This type of floor sheathing <br />does meet current code requirements and is in good condition. <br />The floor insulation is fiberglass batts within the floor joist bays that are primarily unfaced. The insulation <br />appears to have been added in 1978 with a presumed insulation value of R-19. The floor insulation is in fair <br />condition as there are some areas where the insulation has fallen or been removed and the insulation value is <br />below current code requirements for floors. <br />921 MAIN PAGE - 22 <br />