Laserfiche WebLink
DAA JDESIGN <br />ARCH ITECTURE+INTER IORS <br />The primary east -west gable was vaulted in 2023, and it appears that ceiling insulation was added at this time <br />but of an unknown insulation value. The vault is supported by a one -foot -deep ridge beam, exposed on the <br />interior. Skylights in this area indicate that the rafters are approximately one -foot deep, likely 2xl2 rafters <br />sistered to the original rafters, but of unknown spacing. The gable peak is approximately 13'-6" above the <br />finished floor with a spring line of 9'-3". There is a hollow structural steel column exposed in the basement, <br />supported by a concrete footing and connecting to steel above that appears to support the ridge beam. <br />However, the wall finish materials on the main floor prevent confirmation of this assumption. <br />Condition Evaluation: <br />v� Since the roof structure was minimally exposed for analysis, we are unable to give a full condition evaluation at <br />this time. However, it is likely that the roof structure is framed in a similar manner to buildings constructed <br />around the same timeframe in the Louisville area. What is commonly seen on such buildings with gable, hip, <br />and shed roofs is that the ceiling joists and hip beams are undersized and that the rafters are either over - <br />spanned, undersized, or lack proper supports. Furthermore, ceiling joists are often spliced and require a beam <br />or bearing wall support at the splice. It is likely that the vaulted ceiling was built to code standards of 2023 with <br />the exposed ridge beam and supports prescribed by a licensed engineer and new rafters added to meet current <br />code. However, it is impossible to determine any roof construction sizing or methods without further <br />deconstructive investigation of all spaces. <br />Recommendations: <br />The roof and ceiling structure likely do not meet current code standards with the possible exception of the <br />vaulted roof along the north half of the building. Since Louisville did not likely have a building code at the time of <br />construction, we are unable to determine if it was built to a code or engineered. However, it is likely that the <br />original roof is built to a similar standard to other buildings typical of this type and age. <br />All new repairs should be specified by a licensed structural engineer. Repair details should be provided and <br />submitted to the City of Louisville for review and be observed by the engineer and city inspectors during <br />construction. <br />The original roofforms are still apparent from Main Street as seen in the 1940's. <br />921 MAIN PAGE - 25 <br />